It’s probably to give stability in allowing him time to re-built the team somewhat after we lose the likes of Kennedy and Hurn etc. We all see the changing of the guard and, midfield aside, we have most the pieces in our squad, so I get the decision. I don’t disagree with your point mind you - Just that I am happy with the stability it gives us during this transition.
Coaches contract mean pretty much nothing in our game though
Premierships do funny things. Beveridge has finished 6th, 7th (premiership), 10th, 10th/11th?, 7th, 7th. Probably finish between 6-11 again this year. Without that premiership in there he's probably gone at the end of this season.
He'll need to be way more inclusive with his party invite list this time
Lol - my brain just filtered him out.
I'm a big critic of Beveridge. Fluked a premiership but hasn't actually been that great when you look at his H&A record. Tends to over-think things and self-sabotage by putting players out of position and having weird personal fallings-out with several (Stringer, Roughead). Still hasn't been able to get a decent forward line together.
enough time to rewire, restump, replumb.
How about the first couple of posts saying that sacking judge was a bad move!
and who appointed you judge of the ken... judge ....judging...talk
