Ok, fair point. So i guess if i wait a bit more i can start pulling it out ey? Whats the acceptable timefrime in which peoples suffering becomes an available comedy topic? like when people rip out the grouse Steve Irwin Jokes (i heard that one on the day he died), or peter brock jokes(same thing). Hogans heroes, really offensive, lots of people died in that war, couple of million more than mumbai, im sure... Dont you dare find that funny.. Or MASH.. lots of women and kids died in vietnam along with the soldiers.. My god... We are all going to hell..
And the connection between Mumbai and Gryphons is what Nikko? Have I wrongly inferred a racial undertone to your reasoning?
M*A*S*H is set during the Korean war. Korea is an entirely different country from Vietnam with a different culture and ethnically distinct people.
Neither M*A*S*H nor Hogan's Heroes sought to create humour from tragedy. The humour was a way of humanising the participants in tragic events and often made to tragedy so much more poignant (I'm thinking here more of M*A*S*H and less of Hogan's which relied largely on buffoonery for it's dubious laughs).
Maybe I was being precious that day, I don't know, but as a one-off it was distasteful. Given your history I reckon you had stepped to the line a few times and this crossed over it.





