Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I can see of clubs that dont have a junior base are reliant on senior recruits especially country leagues that carry high points giving it a nudge.I doubt any team at div 3 is gonna be over the points cap.
I can see of clubs that dont have a junior base are reliant on senior recruits especially country leagues that carry high points giving it a nudge.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
100% TT, if have no school affiliation or junior pathway, even recruits of average ability could easily be worth 2,3 or even 4 points.
10 new senior players in any given year not out of the question, at an average of 3 gives 30 points. Leaving 18points for remaining 12.
I think some clubs that are currently thinking they are flying with recruits might find it tough to squeeze them all in.
While i agree with the points and salary cap for leagues that pay for the life of me can not get my head around why the lower grades of the ammos (all the D grades) should be encumbered with this as its hard enough to attract good players and enough players to these lower levels then only to be told you are above the points and can not play them to quote Daniel hartford! I call bull dust
It's as if the VAFA wants to drive players away rather than standing strong. In my simple mind, in an Amateur competition, why is there a requirement for points cap. Especially this comp where the width and breadth of types of club's is so varied, a blanket model clearly will not work. It is laziness, ineptitude and more importantly I think a complete disregard for the lower divisions by headquarters that drives this. Either it is Amateur or it is not.
From what I am led to believe the points have been pretty loosely applied previously, and the fear is that a much stricter application of the rules this year.
The difference between a 2 and 3 points meter mightn't sound much, but in reality 50% loading.
Wouldn't be so sure. As it stands a reserves or 3rd XVIII footballer from A B or C wanting to play in the D's is a 3 pointer.Won't be an issue!
Everyone from last year drops a point!
THE EYE
Wouldn't be so sure. As it stands a reserves or 3rd XVIII footballer from A B or C wanting to play in the D's is a 3 pointer.
The point of the VAFA is for the love of the game. Will be laughable when D3 or 4 sides are turning away players from Premier grades as they are not value for points.
Maybe you are looking at a different calculation sheet to the one I have seen
Have you played more reserves than senior games - Yes 2 points
Are you transferring from a Premier Comp to a non Premier Comp (A,B and C are regarded as Premier) - Yes 1 point.
My understanding and I stand to be corrected is that senior games have no bearing on the 2nd question. If you played 1's 2's or 3's (as opposed to clubbies) at an A,B or C club and transferring to a D club you will be a 3 upon transfer. You do drop a point on a yearly basis. But only into 2nd year.
My understanding is that if the VAFA had it's way they wouldn't have points for D clubs. It is AFL Vic that is forcing the issue
What does a D1 club that gets promoted do if they have a cap issue then? (hypothetically)
There will always be issues with any system, what we have isn't bad.
Wouldn't an easy fix be to have the cap at 48 points for A, B, C grades (as they are considered premium comp) and something a fair bit higher for D Grade clubs (& or those not with Juniors/School sides) that get whacked points for players coming from a premium comp (Ammos/Country/Interstate)?
Clubs without Juniors can apply for a 5 point extension above the cap.
It's in the points compensation section. We had applied and received it last year so we had a 55 point cap.That makes some sense if they can. Is that documented anywhere or was that an update at the conference?