My post was more about the fact that we only have our first rounder and a cluster of 4th.You obviously don't want him so no point discussing it with you.
No reason to get cute. Just give Sydney the option of pick 20 or 2019 2nd rounder. Then move on to the Shiel-deal!If we got pick 20 for Hickey (and I'd be happy to sweeten that with pick 57), then I feel that we could move pick 20 (and pick 61) on to Sydney for Hannebury and pick 34.
But I'm dreaming.
Agree, if we trade next years second then I don’t think we can trade next years first so if we r looking to land a Shiel type this trade may be criticalCan’t help but think whatever we get for Hickey will be given to the Swans for Hanners.
Pick 35 more likely than 20.
Doubt we will pay a first for him. Sydney need space and will come to the party.My post was more about the fact that we only have our first rounder and a cluster of 4th.
I don't want him for a first rounder. As stated, we don't know if he's going to be any good.
A future second is probably about right, maybe with a third back.
We can't really count hypothetical trades unless there's some real suggestion that they'll happen.
He also said in his original comments that it was nothing against the player, they are free to get the best deal they can.So Terry Wallet said that Hanners was cooked, the wrong type for Saints and it is trading incompetence to trade him in. Well he was at the press conference yesterday, did he put any of this to Dan?
Yeah i see Hanners like Wells. He only really has to be fit and firing at the right time and he could win you a premiership.Nothing except money.