- Nov 5, 2010
- 9,014
- 4,486
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #176
You certain on that fact? Might want to go back and re-read the stats mate!
Ok, you were 2-3, we're 1-2, lol, F-off now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
You certain on that fact? Might want to go back and re-read the stats mate!
I think Swanny played a number of similar games last year, particularly in the first half of the year. He will always get 30+ possessions, but sometimes the impact just isn't there. His laconic personality and playing style probably make him something of an easy target when things aren't going well too. I'm not really happy with how he's playing, but he's in the same boat as half the team there. I'm confident he'll come good, from memory he has a good record against Port and he should be fired up from the flak he's copped this week.
I think Swanny played a number of similar games last year, particularly in the first half of the year. He will always get 30+ possessions, but sometimes the impact just isn't there. His laconic personality and playing style probably make him something of an easy target when things aren't going well too. I'm not really happy with how he's playing, but he's in the same boat as half the team there. I'm confident he'll come good, from memory he has a good record against Port and he should be fired up from the flak he's copped this week.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
...and clearly ignoring the rest of the post which puts the comments into perspective. I could easily select a single sentence in any number of posts on these boards and draw ridiculous conclusions as you did but then I might be labelled a troll and carded very quickly.Um, I didn't literally mean Buckley's or Scott's personality has won or lost games.
I was using the word personality do describe a new person. ie. Chris Scott is a totally new personality to enter the GFC. You could also instead use the words; figure, individual, etc etc.
Fixed!Who Dane Swan?
Oh, you were referring to me. What an intelligent and thought provoking response!
Aufwiedersehen all, I can't interpret the language anymore.
Its been fun.
Everyone has quiet games or hit flat spots in their careers, I think the main problem is that he didn't seem to care. Pendles for example had a quiet game but you could see he was busting his gut to try and make an impact. Even when Judd gets tagged out of a game you can see the amount of effort he puts in, I'm not sure the same can be said for swan. Obviously he's a different style of player to the other two but he seems to lack their desire to take over a game when things aren't going so well.
It can't be. That's the thing.
I don't care if Swan doesn't get 30 possessions. As I said earlier, I'd rather he gets 15-20 and hurts you with them.
Or if he IS playing shithouse, then at least do the things that ARE within your control regardless of form. Lay tackles, put your body in, block, shepherd, all those things that only laziness can you stop you from doing.
All good points Ed and I agree that he wasn't damaging with his possesions but neither was Pendles, Thomas, etc...
Are we critical of Swan's individual performance on a night where the entire midfield stunk?
Lets play the long game on this and reserve judgement until the mid-season point.
^ Was he that bad against the Hawks?
The moment you start looking forward to retirement, then your probably done. quote]
Looks like Im done then.
Well, he wasn't what I'd call good.
Unless you think Buttifant is responsible for the injuries players got last year and over the preseason I'm not sure how you can come to that conclusion. The players have all said that each preseason has been tougher than the last.
wtf? Makes it even more unjustified with that reasoning...James Clement retired young but at least he did not announce it a year or two before he did it. Only when the season was dead and buried did Clement tell the football world of his decision.
And I bet Clement didn't have the drug testers beating on his door at 6am every few months while he was playing. You can tell that he led a squeaky clean lifestyle just like Ball or Buckley.
Some will surely vehemently disagree but Swanny needs a bit of a rocket! He just isnt delivering to his normal standards atm, and it's not good enough from a senior player of his ilk.
Last year the Dane was top 2 or 3 (at the Club) for contested possessions, top for clearances, tackled (double the number), had better DE%, was in the leadership group, wasnt talking about retiring, kicked about 1.3 goals per game and won Charlie - generally was awesome.
He did have a down patch (he looked sore) from about round 9 (Crows game) to the Arizona freshener - but then really hit his straps - his first four or five games were also good too iirc.
For me it's a major worry for Swanny to be way down in "Didaka" voting (1 solitary vote so far!) - i'm sure he wouldnt be doing too well in the Copeland either - last year's Didaka almost reflected the voting in the Copeland.
This year, i expected more of the same but i'm not seeing it - i would like to see more of last year's numbers - he is down across the board as i posted in the 'critical assessment thread'. The two that really stand out for me are - contested possies down from 13 to 9.5 and clearances from 6 to 3.7.
I am sure people expect Swanny to reach his standards and i expect him to reach them! He is a senior player and should be leading by example! There is no slack left to cut him unfortunately as losing Bally he will be expected to raise his intensity along with the others. Pendles, in stark contrast, has already shown great improvement in his intensity and even including his shocker against the Blues is ahead in his averages on last year!
Dane, and believe me i am an armchair slob, please immediately improve in these areas for the sake of our footy club mate - we need you to it now - please!
/end of hysterical rant!
7 tackles today, a clear improvement defensively![]()