Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Not 31.So, what number shall we give Dangerfield guys?

Danger not running for Adelaide in the Grand Final Sprint..
Coincidence?![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
EFAHaha.
He was never going to run, he wanted a break from winning it.
Clarkson to Adelaide? Is the dream over?
Nah Viney to join his mate Wines at Port,
Word on DL is that Danger is not sold on us so the optimism level over there went from a 10 to about a 2 haha. One of the guys said Danger himself was the source.
I'm optimistic about us trading in another big fish this year but this is already getting me annoyed. One minute i'm optimistic then i'm upset again feels like i'm going through PMS.
Viney signs contract extensionNah Viney to join his mate Wines at Port, Danger to the Cats, Rivers back to the Ds + 1st round pick.
No way Clarkson goes to Adelaide IMO.
He's built Hawthorn to what it is, they're still playing well so his message is obviously still working - don't see him leaving.
This. There is a lot of shit going on at Adelaide and getting rid of Dangerfield would just make things worse, even if they get good value for him. He's their best and one of their most important players. Personally I think they'd be better off risking the extra year trying to lock him up. They still have a strong list so could work their way up the ladder a bit next year and if that happens staying will be a lot more appealing to him. If they get someone in to coach who isn't a space cadet that'll help massively in keeping him too. They have to back themselves here I think.I get the principle, but I think the boards of clubs will still be loathe to trade out big name players. Dangerfield is probably the Crows most popular and marketable player and a key component of their side. If they offload him this year for say #3 and #20 ish instead of getting #10 or so next season, are they going to have riots from Adelaide fans after sacking their coach, pawning off their best player and dropping down the pecking order on the ladder? You'd want to be absolutely confident that the bloke is gone before you make the deal. I get that they're better off taking a deal this trade period and getting closer to his actual value, but are you willing to have that conversation with a thousand toothless screaming Adelaide supporters at the next AGM?
I agree, but Bomber Thompson bailed on Geelong while under contract and in the midst of premiership glory, so it's not without precedence
I agree, but Bomber Thompson bailed on Geelong while under contract and in the midst of premiership glory, so it's not without precedence
Bomber had also made it clear that contract was going to be his last anyway.Bomber didn't go to coach another club as a senior coach though, and he made it clear he was worn out.
No not cutting our losses but Toump isn't rated as a pick 4 anymore, I love the bloke but if you want to get something good to your club then you've got to give up something of valueAre we cutting our losses on Toumpas already? In any case, that is still effectively a proposal of Picks 2 + 4 for Dangerfield.
**** no.thoughts on #2, #3 and tapscott for Danger and Lyons?
Kid dominated the SAFL and was sub most of the year for the crows. When he wasn't I thought he was quite good, definitely outclassed with Danger/Sloane in the guts but would be another of those Viv Michie types we could mould into a decent player.**** no.
I've never seen the kid but he'd have to be amazing for #2 and #3. Way too many eggs in that basket.Kid dominated the SAFL and was sub most of the year for the crows. When he wasn't I thought he was quite good, definitely outclassed with Danger/Sloane in the guts but would be another of those Viv Michie types we could mould into a decent player.
Remember Sydneys 2004-2006 teams were full of guys like that