Remove this Banner Ad

Danger Zone

  • Thread starter Thread starter IanW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You say sociopath, I say highly focused professional. Either way, Im glad he's at the Giants.

I like you Ian, you've been stoic in your stance of the essendon saga

But I can't quite work you out

I have 3 opinions

1. The greatest big footy troll ever

2. A computer programme

3. I won't share because it's offensive
 
Nothing personal, but stop dicking us around over Frost - he's done good and played hard in an under-pressure defense, not that you f.cks know anything about that. Make it one point two over three, and we can do this.
You do realise that Viney is just his username. He's not actually Todd Viney and involved in our list management decisions
 
I like you Ian, you've been stoic in your stance of the essendon saga

But I can't quite work you out

I have 3 opinions

1. The greatest big footy troll ever

2. A computer programme

3. I won't share because it's offensive

:)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nothing personal, but stop dicking us around over Frost - he's done good and played hard in an under-pressure defense, not that you f.cks know anything about that. Make it one point two over three, and we can do this.

Are you coming from a GWS perspective ? If so, what's it matter what he's paid ? GWS concern is what they can get for him. Your post comes across as though your on a percentage of his earn.

And Frost is only on the radar because (allegedly - I haven't actually read it) he's asked to be traded to Vic


Just out of interest, who would be your top 5 "untouchables" from GWS ?
 
Everyone is forgetting that our entire drafts for the next three years are going to the Dogs for Will Minson...
 
Are you coming from a GWS perspective ? If so, what's it matter what he's paid ? GWS concern is what they can get for him. Your post comes across as though your on a percentage of his earn.

And Frost is only on the radar because (allegedly - I haven't actually read it) he's asked to be traded to Vic


Just out of interest, who would be your top 5 "untouchables" from GWS ?

Mostly, it's strategic - I want kids playing for GWS to know that if they work their guts out, and go from the club, then they will still be well-paid professionals. I dont want kids to coast on talent - I want every kid going through the club to not only know he could win a Brownlow, but that he should win a Brownlow.

Frost's a decent KPD prospect - he has played hard and done good, and I'd prefer to keep him.

Top 5 GWS untouchables ? Cameron, Treloar, Ward, Davis, Mumford.
 
Mostly, it's strategic - I want kids playing for GWS to know that if they work their guts out, and go from the club, then they will still be well-paid professionals. I dont want kids to coast on talent - I want every kid going through the club to not only know he could win a Brownlow, but that he should win a Brownlow.

Frost's a decent KPD prospect - he has played hard and done good, and I'd prefer to keep him.

Top 5 GWS untouchables ? Cameron, Treloar, Ward, Davis, Mumford.

Cheers. Interesting. Might pursue this with you some other time
I hate people taking threads off-topic which is exactly what I'm doing

So how about that Paddy Dangerfield hey ? Where's he going ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm being serious - assuming Mr Nathan Jones is off the table, who do Melbourne have that Adelaide would want ?

A handful of early draft picks and a dick head of a kpf to replace tippet?
 
At any rate his interview on the Footy Show tonight makes it seem extremely unlikely that he'd walk out on the club this year. Would certainly appear to be a ridiculous hypocrite (Mitch Clark levels) given how he spoke about the Crows.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This is basically what West Coast got for Judd. Dangerfield is not Judd.
he's not far off, Judd was leaving for Carlton anyway, either via trade or via the pre season draft, West Coast wanted Carlton's pick 1 and they didn't get what they want, they forced to make that trade
 
At any rate his interview on the Footy Show tonight makes it seem extremely unlikely that he'd walk out on the club this year. Would certainly appear to be a ridiculous hypocrite (Mitch Clark levels) given how he spoke about the Crows.

Yep, I thought the same thing watching it. I don't think he's going anywhere.
 
The problem is the crows don't want to trade Dangerfield, they have confidence he will stay and you would have to offer something so ridiculous that they can't refuse.
 
The problem is the crows don't want to trade Dangerfield, they have confidence he will stay and you would have to offer something so ridiculous that they can't refuse.
For some reason this made me think of Bachar Houli and how Essendon stubbornly didn't trade him because Hird was convinced they could convince him to stay even though blind Freddy could see Houli desperately wanted out. Obviously there is no reason why Danger would want to leave, I'm just saying the comment 'confident he will stay' reminded me of that situation. Having said all that from what I hear Danger is well entrenched into Adelaide atm, but everybody has a price and suddenly he may start feeling home sick. That's free agency is these days you either trade players before they come out of contract or you need to extend existing contracts quickly because the longer it goes on the less likely they stay.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom