Last time I checked GWS had pick 3???
Check again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Last time I checked GWS had pick 3???
Check again.
Omg Frawley's not worth Pick 3!!!!! Second rounder @ best!!!!!!**** me dead, we've got pick #3!
Omg Frawley's not worth Pick 3!!!!! Second rounder @ best!!!!!!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
All this talk of Beams and Dangerfield is disappointing. After missing out on Blicavs this trade period will always seem like a loss.
I love after every single year of failure at the draft since god knows when we just assume that brayshaw and petracca will come good
You don't recognise the difference ? They're both big bodied mids with good pace.
Scully = small
I like Trengove, but the foot/pace has curtailed him
Watts = complete and utter softcork
Toumpas = weak in the contest
Morton = see above
Gysberts = weak, slow and no endurance
If you can't see the difference with two big bodied inside mids with Petracca and Brayshaw, who thrive on contested footy then it says far more about you and your footy acumen then anything else.
Not to mention the fact we have an admin / coaching team with a proven record of development
Ffs, neeld / prenderghastly / Cameron etc ain't here any more
You don't recognise the difference ? They're both big bodied mids with good pace.
Scully = small
I like Trengove, but the foot/pace has curtailed him
Watts = complete and utter softcork
Toumpas = weak in the contest.
You don't recognise the difference ? They're both big bodied mids with good pace.
Scully = small
I like Trengove, but the foot/pace has curtailed him
Watts = complete and utter softcork
Toumpas = weak in the contest
Morton = see above
Gysberts = weak, slow and no endurance
If you can't see the difference with two big bodied inside mids with Petracca and Brayshaw, who thrive on contested footy then it says far more about you and your footy acumen then anything else.
Yes because we were so aware of those guys deficiencies when we took them .....
Don't assume
Plenty of star kids don't make it
Scully - 181 cm 78kgIf Scully was small, then Toumpas is microscopic. I doubt he'll ever be useful in a contest - what the hell was Neeld doing choosing Toumpas over Wines? I was annoyed at the time, now I'm livid after the season Wines has had. Most players of Toumpas' stature are forward pocket goalsneaks. Wonder if he has any potential for that role?
Scully - 181 cm 78kg
Toumpas - 183 cm 79kg.
This after Scully being in the system several seasons longer than Toumpas.
Hindsight says we, along with every other club who passed on Wines got that wrong, but it is seriously time to move on.
Don't know what sort of inside info he is privy to but Shannon Byrnes dad reckons 2&3 for Dangerfield is very close to being done and when it goes through we'll pull the trigger on the trengove trade or similar to get back into the first round of the draft. Would rather keep trengove than take a chance on a mid first rounder myself.
Grain of salt and all that
One thing I'm certain about is that we won't be trading both 2 and 3.
Are those statistics confirmed correct? If so, I'm very surprised. I remember the draft lineup when Toumpas was standing near Wines and it was like David standing next to Goliath. Toumpas just looks so small next to average players. But if those numbers are right, I stand corrected.Scully - 181 cm 78kg
Toumpas - 183 cm 79kg.
This after Scully being in the system several seasons longer than Toumpas.
Hindsight says we, along with every other club who passed on Wines got that wrong, but it is seriously time to move on.
Taken from player bios on respective club websites.Are those statistics confirmed correct? If so, I'm very surprised. I remember the draft lineup when Toumpas was standing near Wines and it was like David standing next to Goliath. Toumpas just looks so small next to average players. But if those numbers are right, I stand corrected.
One thing I'm certain about is that we won't be trading both 2 and 3.
Agree.
We'd have to offer up something great to get Danger - but 2 and 3 is overs for almost any player in the comp.
Watts = complete and utter softcork
Would that be the old style cork that floats or the modern twist type?
I wonder how Watts or any of those other players would have developed if they had of being drafted into a team with an excellent development program like Hawthorn or Sydney. I don't have the answer.