And you'd know about not even showing up to a final in 2018!You would know about dissapearing at half time in a 2019 prelim
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you'd know about not even showing up to a final in 2018!You would know about dissapearing at half time in a 2019 prelim
Things this thread proves:
- You can’t be a good player if you’ve ever had a bad half of a game. Don Bradman was clearly s**t, highlighted by his run-less effort in his most recent match.
- if you make a lot of mistakes with the ball, the fact that you get it more often than 99.9 per cent of the competition is irrelevant.
- if there is any flaw at all on your game, you are, undoubtedly, crap at it. Hence Mohammad Ali was crap at boxing. ‘Well if you look at his landed punch percentage when trying to connect with crouching fighters who bob and weave like Frazier, it’s very low. So he’s no superstar.’
Just facts more than anything.
No one mentioned he is cap except for you. Your words mate.Things this thread proves:
- You can’t be a good player if you’ve ever had a bad half of a game. Don Bradman was clearly s**t, highlighted by his run-less effort in his most recent match.
- if you make a lot of mistakes with the ball, the fact that you get it more often than 99.9 per cent of the competition is irrelevant.
- if there is any flaw at all on your game, you are, undoubtedly, crap at it. Hence Mohammad Ali was crap at boxing. ‘Well if you look at his landed punch percentage when trying to connect with crouching fighters who bob and weave like Frazier, it’s very low. So he’s no superstar.’
Just facts more than anything.
paddy clangers is not analogous with the likes of bradman and ali.
a very very good player at his best yet but a tier down from the true great mids of the modern era. had one year as the standout player of the comp, just like many others have.
It's that kick inside 50 when is running away from the center square at speed, where he absolutely butchers the ball.
Predominately, he either:
1) skanks the shot at goal on the run, or
2) overcooks the kick to a teammate inside the 50m arc
It happens time and time again
For comparison, the best I have ever seen at either hitting a teammate lace out or nailing the goal whilst running at top speed was Jason Akermanis
Sorry but he is.
I must have read two dozen posts, perhaps not in as many words but intimating at least, that his second half in the prelim final somehow makes him s**t.
Using this logic, going missing in any big game for a period, even if you’ve dominated half of it, would also be true. Therefore the analogy stands.
Went surfingHis disappearance H2 PF 2019 was stunning.
You gotta get the ball to be able to shank it.
This is possibly the dumbest post I have read on this forum. Congrats.
If Dangerfield had a nicer kick he'd be the best player I've ever seen. He'd be an insane Voss / Akermanis super hybrid. So imo he's doing fine. Still a superstar despite not being perfect.
Dangerfield is not a good kick. He is an ok kick at best...but quite regularly shanks his kicks and / or misses relatively straight forward set shots for goal.
He is still elite as a mid which goes to show how good he would be if he was at a minimum a good kick (let alone elite kick).
I love the guns who make their teammates better players. Sam Mitchell, Luke Hodge, Voss, Cotchin, Martin...there's a stack of them. They went out of their way to bring their teammates into the game. Would I classify Dangerfield in the same way...nah i don't see it. Maybe it's because I don't see enough Cats games to see him week in, week out. Any cats supporters with a view on this?
He is one of the very best...don't get me wrong.
Thank you. Some common sense.
Let’s have a look at his game.
His marking is basically unmatched by midfielders - Fyfe is the only one who comes close. He’s probably the best part time key forward among midfielders. His goal kicking is actually decent when he’s not at full tilt. His ball winning and extracting is absolutely elite. His tackling is strong as an ox and he breaks tackles himself. He kicks well when he has time. He handpasses very well especially considering he’s usually in a lot of traffic. His engine is huge and he has a huge will to get himself to the next contest. I’d say he’s allowed a weakness
Fyfe doesn't come just close, he's a better mark. Both this year and across his career.
I would also have Dusty ahead of him in terms of being a part time key forward. Not in a traditional marking sense, but I think if you asked who any defender would hate to be left one-out with they'd probably say Dusty. More reliable kick for goal and can exploit you in more ways.
That said he's probably the most dynamic and explosive midfielder in the game, particularly when it comes to attacking the ball at a stoppage and getting a clearance at speed.
It's his relative weakness to others. Every player has their own flaws. Dusty for example doesn't tackle or chase and isn't great overhead
Indeed. Peak Selwood doesn’t mark as well either.
All these areas are probably why Ablett and to an extent Judd stand above them because even their weaknesses weren’t really weaknesses as such (though abletts strength and overhead ability has diminished since he did his shoulder admittedly)
Things that would have detracted for Danger in west coasts eye's were decision making on the run, endurance and kicking at full speed not to mention being victorian. Pretty much a harder Wojinski in that regard, awesome pace and able to really run and carry from the backline but stuffs the kick up a lot of the time at full pace.
I would actually rate Cotchin as one of the biggest reasons Richmond have been top dog for the last three years. He went from a brownlow medalist, to choosing to kick against the wind, to becoming monstrous again. Goes under the radar. Been very critical of him in the past myself, but he is definitely back to his best - for example Dusty has the awful habit of starting years off horribly, while Cotchin is Mr. Reliable nowadays.Dangerfield is not a good kick. He is an ok kick at best...but quite regularly shanks his kicks and / or misses relatively straight forward set shots for goal.
He is still elite as a mid which goes to show how good he would be if he was at a minimum a good kick (let alone elite kick).
I love the guns who make their teammates better players. Sam Mitchell, Luke Hodge, Voss, Cotchin, Martin...there's a stack of them. They went out of their way to bring their teammates into the game. Would I classify Dangerfield in the same way...nah i don't see it. Maybe it's because I don't see enough Cats games to see him week in, week out. Any cats supporters with a view on this?
He is one of the very best...don't get me wrong.
I think Dusty and Tim Kelly meet 1 and 2, though not to the level of GAJ in his prime.You only really have 3 options, 1. be an elite clearance player 2. be an elite ball user or 3. Be Gary Ablett jnr. That's what makes Gary so special and above the rest as he's the only footballer that's above average to elite in almost all categories.