He SHOULD replace Jack but our coach will never do that.
In what way is he a similar player to Jack?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He SHOULD replace Jack but our coach will never do that.
In what way is he a similar player to Jack?
Not me.It's the excuse all Geelong supporters are using to justify why he was delisted
Have stood by Dan up until now but agree with Mr Blicavs that he's cooked.
If he can get 2 years of the Saints he should take it and we should move on from him.
Before he was moved on in fact.
You’ll see, 2nd half of a season and he struggles to move and is less effective
Does that mean you guys end your interest in Townsend? I wouldn't have thought you'd take both.Worth a gamble at least. Rather gamble on Menzel than take a bloke 100+ who is pretty likely to be average. If we manage Menzel it could work
Sounds like we've already cooled on him. Swans stated that there as only ever one spot up for grabs and the rest will be used in the draft. It looks like you guys will rookie list him.Does that mean you guys end your interest in Townsend? I wouldn't have though you'd take both.
Does that mean you guys end your interest in Townsend? I wouldn't have thought you'd take both.
Word is that Mills and Jones will move to the midfield more permanently. Right now Heeney plays just about every position on the field but I'm also hoping he gets more time in the guts.Too talented not to be on a list, so good for him, but I'm confused by the fit.
I would've though with either Reid or Naismith (sending Sinclair forward) the Swans would play an extra tall plus Buddy and young McCartin as the 3 marking options. With Blakely an option as well. Hayward a nice medium 4th tall. Ronke and another flanker (ie. Jack replacement) as the running types. Then rotate Papley, Heeney and Parker as the 7th forwards.
Probably needs some depth in the running flanker types but in terms of goal kickers inside 50 I think there's 4 options - Buddy, Reid/Sinclair, Hayward, Parker/Heeney that can win match ups.
In which case their list priorities would be finding some mature midfielders to replenish that area of the ground that just lost Hannebery and is clearly coming down from a peak a few years ago.
A team that's been based around defensive play and already struggles to lock it in forward adding Menzel is a bit confusing to me. I could see him playing a lot of NEAFL next year.
Watch Stevie J get the best out of him.
I want the ranga back. Will be a very very popular boy at Geelong before the end of next season.
Menzel is a list liability in the making. One we dont require.
I know the two clubs have a comfy relationship off the field, but we dont need either club doing sweetheart deals whenever the phone rings for a favour.
Its a business.
If he truly was in any sort of demand one of the Vic clubs would have thrown him a rope...and he would have taken it.
Now the fwd line looks stacked with stay home specialists that dont rotate with any impact, when we need a new generation of quality midfielders just to get it down there.
Will tolerate as long as we do not screw with and play Tom McCartin. Youngest guy in the game and did everything we could ask. He has the potential to be a seriously good mobile CHF and needs games games games.
Dont see a place for Menzel anywhere.
Nahh not happy.
Not me.
Before he was moved on in fact.
You’ll see, 2nd half of a season and he struggles to move and is less effective
It’s not the goals, it’s the agility.Some truth in that but its an over exaggeration he kicked 27 goals from 13 games. His tackle count could have been better but his goal assists was on the up.It was odd that Geelong didnt give him a contract considered the squad is lacking depth.
wasn't a fan oof signing him, but it is a low risk, high reward kind of thing. Wouldn't bee surprised if there are games played triggers for another contract.
Menzel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rohan.
Weird preference from the Cats there.
100 goals from his last 51 games is a decent rate, second only to Hawkins at Geelong. It's an odd delisting. Yes, his scoring dries up somewhat towards the end of seasons, but it's still at a fairly good level, and all scoring does tend to dry up late in the season.
Bring in Rohan and punt Menzel, *******s.
Outside of Hawkins no-one else knows how to kick a goal at Geelong.(Kelly went alright with 24 for his first season)
Yay, let's get rid of a bloke who can kick goals but isn't the strongest tackler in the league and play blokes that can't kick goals and can't ******* tackle either.
It's the excuse all Geelong supporters are using to justify why he was delisted
Well well well injured already. It’s as if he’s cooked after all, sadly.
P.S. Don’t bother replying podgey, your views on football are worthless.
Well well well injured already. It’s as if he’s cooked after all, sadly.
P.S. Don’t bother replying podgey, your views on football are worthless.