Daniel Rich V Rhys Palmer

[Flawed Genius]

On SEN this afternoon, heard the comment that Daniel Rich is already better than Rhys Palmer.
What do you reckon?

 

[Upgrayedd]

Nathan Jawai is already better then kevin garnett.

Ild probably pick Rich, but who knows how he will be like once hes playing in the AFL??

Wouldnt pick between a gun first year AFL player and a superstar under 18 kid. its pointless and absolutly nonsense that you can compare both right now

Rich seems more promising then Palmer.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Rich has more upside. Palmer will be damn good though

 

[hellfire]

I've never seen Rich, and he hasn't even played at AFL level, so it's impossible to say. But given the hype, I'd like to have him. I'll take Palmer though.

 

[Lynch takes a mark]

Rich much more potential but Palmer was far more productive in 07 than Rich has been 08.

 

[MC_9]

I cant believe this is serious.

So we are comparing a player that isnt even part of team let alone played an AFL game, to a guy that is most likely going to win the rising start award.

Wow, just wow.

 

[anti.]

one has played 9 AFL games and performed as well as someone can be expected and the other has played WAFL and still not performed as well as the other even though he is in a lesser competition.

yeah, palmer.

 

[BacharHouli_43]

I cant believe this is serious.

So we are comparing a player that isnt even part of team let alone played an AFL game, to a guy that is most likely going to win the rising start award.

Wow, just wow.

exactly, palmer is already performing like a star at afl level, imagine where freo's future would look like without him

 

[OrangeCutter]

Its the point of the board its all hypothetical bull sh1t just enjoy the read and crap or go to another bored. For mine i dont know havnt seen rich put palmer looks like being a quality player

edit: My bad i though draft and trading bored not polls lol. Dont mind me

 

[iGNITER]

Id take the proven player at AFL level - Palmer