Player Watch Darcy Moore

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
While I can understand people pushing for Moore to be played forward (and I'm not steadfast against it myself) I'd warn against the assumption it's a fait accompli that he'll become a star in this position.

The simple reality is his ability to become one of the gun forwards of the competition remains an unknown quantity, he hasn't started a game as a forward in years now and taking away a current AA key defender from his position in a game where the opposition has 2 key forwards of quality (3 with Allen) appears a text book case of robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Hasn't Moore himself stated also he prefers playing a role in defence?
 
While I can understand people pushing for Moore to be played forward (and I'm not steadfast against it myself) I'd warn against the assumption it's a fait accompli that he'll become a star in this position.

The simple reality is his ability to become one of the gun forwards of the competition remains an unknown quantity, he hasn't started a game as a forward in years now and taking away a current AA key defender from his position in a game where the opposition has 2 key forwards of quality (3 with Allen) appears a text book case of robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Hasn't Moore himself stated also he prefers playing a role in defence?

Problem with him Back we can Keep Scores Down but we still Struggle to Kick a Winning Score though he is our Best Kick and that could be missed with him Forward
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I've been in favour of Darcy the defender, but the goal posts havee changed - it's the right time to try Darcy forward and Kelly in defence IMO.

Doesn’t matter how far you shift the goal posts, you still need your best playing on their best. Moore remains our best KPD. Who knows how many goals these forwards would have scored on a lesser defender.
 
Doesn’t matter how far you shift the goal posts, you still need your best playing on their best. Moore remains our best KPD. Who knows how many goals these forwards would have scored on a lesser defender.

Then our Forwards won't kick that many
 
Hasn't Moore himself stated also he prefers playing a role in defence?
Probably but don't let that get in the way of the armchair experts' cool stories on here.

It would make perfectly logical sense to many on here to take the best defender in the league out of the backline.
 
I’m not sure about what to think on last night. On pure numbers, I’d say pushing Moore forward was relatively successful from an individual performance perspective. A 3 goal return from extremely limited opportunities, after over 3 years in defence and basically no practice as a forward or opportunity to develop synergy with the other forwards or mids is very good.

He was desperately missed in defence though, especially after Howe went down. It was pretty baffling to see him remain in the forward line for the entire game when the defence was under siege and forward entries were non existent.

It will be very interesting to see whether Buckley stays the course and keeps him forward, or flakes out and returns him to defence next week.
 
I’m not sure about what to think on last night. On pure numbers, I’d say pushing Moore forward was relatively successful from an individual performance perspective. A 3 goal return from extremely limited opportunities, after over 3 years in defence and basically no practice as a forward or opportunity to develop synergy with the other forwards or mids is very good.

He was desperately missed in defence though, especially after Howe went down. It was pretty baffling to see him remain in the forward line for the entire game when the defence was under siege and forward entries were non existent.

It will be very interesting to see whether Buckley stays the course and keeps him forward, or flakes out and returns him to defence next week.
Good post, however it won’t be a case of Buckley flaking out though, it will be needs based.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

An article in today's The Age, by Peter Ryan:

Collingwood understand that moving Darcy Moore from defence to attack robs Peter to pay Paul.

But when a key position player as good as Moore stands in defence while the team battles to win a contest forward, let alone score, the thought becomes impossible to resist.

So it was no surprise when Magpies coach Nathan Buckley finally pulled the trigger and started Moore forward against West Coast.
Moore kicked three goals as the Magpies’ prime target. He played well in the first and the last quarter but was noticeably out of the picture when the Eagles took control of the game in the middle two quarters.

In that time Collingwood defender Jeremy Howe was injured and the inexperienced Mark Keane was outclassed as Eagles forwards Jack Darling and Oscar Allen dominated to finish with five goals each.

The Magpies lost but their first quarter was their most impressive of the season. AFL legend Leigh Matthews thought the move ruined the Magpies’ winning hopes, but eight premierships doesn’t give you more than one seat on the overpopulated jury sitting in judgment, which remains out on whether the move is a good one for the Magpies.

More evidence will be gathered on Sunday when Collingwood play Essendon.

All-Australian defender and former Cat Harry Taylor, who played forward without great success in 2017, said Moore faces an unenviable task transforming from gun defender to threatening forward.

“It’s probably is a bit harder than what I thought it might be initially,” Taylor said.

Buckley will be under no illusion as to how difficult it is to create forwards out of defenders. Since he began coaching he’s tried Tyson Goldsack, Ben Reid and Brody Mihocek, who was drafted as a defender, up forward, with only Mihocek a resounding success.

Premiership forward Travis Cloke’s form waned under Buckley while Jesse White and Mason Cox teased.

Now it’s over to Moore – who played forward at the start of his career as the likely successor to Cloke – to attempt to fill the gaping hole inside 50 dogging Buckley’s tenure.

Now coaching in the SANFL, former AFL assistant coach Jade Rawlings says no one should underestimate the challenge confronting players in Moore’s position with the game’s evolution making role changes harder. “Back in the ’90s there wasn’t as much rigid structure about where you are supposed to lead and where you are supposed to be at a stoppage,” Rawlings said. “These days there are watertight structural components forward of footy that they have to work in with five other boys. It’s not just a free hit to play your own way … it’s a unique player and style of person as well who can adapt to that.”

One former player with experience both ends of the ground says he is yet to see Moore’s forward craft.

The question in his mind is whether Moore is a forward who went back and is now going forward again or whether he is a back who is being thrown forward.
He suspects Moore to be a natural back who should stay put although those close to Moore argue differently.

Taylor knows that unless you have a forward’s traits a limit can be reached playing forward that doesn’t exist behind the ball. “A lot of people just think he is a great mark as a defender, he’s quick and he reads the ball well and he can just transfer those skills to being a forward but at the AFL level where everything is so elite it’s not quite as transferable,” Taylor said. In simple terms, everyone is trying to stop a forward when they are going for a mark, from the moment they make their first move to when they fly for the ball. The same usually doesn’t apply to defenders who are ignored until they come up holding the ball.

Taylor said he found marking in defence, which required him to run back with the ball or run patterns that allowed him to hook into marking contests, much easier than running hard at the football on the lead as a forward. “You have to do a lot of work earlier to actually influence the contest,” Taylor said.

This season, Melbourne’s Tom McDonald and Essendon’s Cale Hooker have returned forward through necessity and are faring well, but not before most considered that the prospect of them playing there again had passed.

Moore, who won his first All-Australian jumper last season as a defender, is seen as a better defender than either of those two were but Buckley’s hand has, to some extent, been forced. “It’s always a set of trade-offs,” Rawlings said.

“There is more to it than just competing. Can they impact the game? Have they got the conditioning to repeatedly deal with the best backs in the game? It’s not as easy as people think.“
Moore, for his part, only asked Buckley that he not be considered the white knight capable of solving the team’s problems forward when told of the move. Buckley understands that sentiment, given he played virtually every position in his illustrious career when the team was struggling.
He knows there are very few Dave Grohls in football, multi-talented people able to switch from playing drums with Nirvana to being the Foo Fighters’ frontman with a guitar in hand.
Most are hoping Moore is that rare beast but Buckley’s expectations are more modest.
“We weren’t providing a consistent enough contest or options to the ball carrier so we wanted to change that up and a key part of that has been Darcy going forward and we need to explore that more,” Buckley said.

On Sunday, the MCG becomes Moore’s stage, a performance within a match that could determine Collingwood’s immediate future and a young gun’s football life.

Back and forward – success stories
Matthew Pavlich (Fremantle)
Peter Knights (Hawthorn)
David Neitz (Melbourne)
Chad Cornes (Port Adelaide)
Alastair Lynch (Fitzroy/Brisbane Lions)
Brent Crosswell (Carlton/North Melbourne)
Adam Hunter (West Coast)
Scott Lucas (Essendon)

Back and forward – hit and miss
Tom McDonald (Melbourne)
Michael Hurley (Essendon)
Harry Taylor (Geelong)
Lachie Henderson (Carlton/Geelong)
Jacob Weitering (Carlton)
 
We need to pick a direction with him. He’s either a forward or a defender
He’s a defender when we’re a competitive side. Right now he just plays where matchups and player development dictate. If Keane and Kelly are in, he should play predominantly forward.
 
His best position would be as a free range ruckman, however he is a very good contested mark so can play a KP.

100% agree, we need him where the ball is, as a mobile ruckman he would be enormous, but we are in a position where our current ruck is on a long term deal so we are kind of stuck.
if we develop some key backs ( I do like what I’ve seen with Keane, shows potential ) we can play him forward, until then , he has to play back where he can impact the game with his marking and rebound
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top