Thread starter
#1
Well my favourite analyst David King is at it again after a couple of week absence on theories for beating Collingwood. Last week he was back;
"Run it through the corridor, isolate the backs - that's how you beat the Pies!"
Terrific work again Kingy, I think that was theory number 15 this year.
But a new week dawns, so he must come up with theory 16. Well, "holy Carey!" he thinks to himself, "Pies won by 52 points, and I said on air that the West Coast talls would isolate and worry the Pies defence. I need something"
But what. Hey wait, let's look around at another club. "Hawthorn", he says to himself, "hey they did something different!" "Oh, now I won't bring up the fact that they played the bulldogs who don't contest and completely play a wide receiving game"
"Hey Mr. Wheatley, I think Hawthorn kicked it and took 180 marks is a style made solely to beat Collingwood"
Well Mr. King, you've done it again. Theory 16 is looking like your best yet.
"Run it through the corridor, isolate the backs - that's how you beat the Pies!"
Terrific work again Kingy, I think that was theory number 15 this year.
But a new week dawns, so he must come up with theory 16. Well, "holy Carey!" he thinks to himself, "Pies won by 52 points, and I said on air that the West Coast talls would isolate and worry the Pies defence. I need something"
But what. Hey wait, let's look around at another club. "Hawthorn", he says to himself, "hey they did something different!" "Oh, now I won't bring up the fact that they played the bulldogs who don't contest and completely play a wide receiving game"
"Hey Mr. Wheatley, I think Hawthorn kicked it and took 180 marks is a style made solely to beat Collingwood"
Well Mr. King, you've done it again. Theory 16 is looking like your best yet.

