Remove this Banner Ad

Dawes

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bangonballsup said:
I'm not Travis Bloke but I love the nick, wish I'd thought of it but I was probably too drunk :D
Click to expand...
You've been drunk already? Its Tuesday afternoon!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Bangonballsup said:
That just doesn't make sense, you can't pau someone 500K and try to pass them off as pick 20 value o_O
Click to expand...
Haven't we clarified that the Herald Sun pulls everything out of their arse?

Anyway. I'm sure you'll get to CJ's latest post soon enough...
 
How about we trust the coaches decision, I didn't last year with clark and myself and many of others were made to look like a fool. Who honestly gives a hoot how much he gets payed, none of our players deserve to be on big contracts, Dawes is a true professional whatever coin he gets I'm sure he deserves it. Neeld knows Dawes a hell of a lot better than any one of us, we said we gave overs for clark we were wrong an it could be déjà vu with Dawes.
 
Eth said:
Haven't we clarified that the Herald Sun pulls everything out of their arse?
Click to expand...
No you haven't because it's confirmed that at least 4 clubs have offered him 500K over the last 12 months setting the market and you simply wouldn't be in the race if you were offering less.. it's not like you have a premiership window to entice him with.. although I can see one in 3 years if he signs a 2nd contract with you I doubt he's looking that far ahead when weighing up options
 
PureFooty said:
How about we trust the coaches decision, I didn't last year with clark and myself and many of others were made to look like a fool. Who honestly gives a hoot how much he gets payed, none of our players deserve to be on big contracts, Dawes is a true professional whatever coin he gets I'm sure he deserves it. Neeld knows Dawes a hell of a lot better than any one of us, we said we gave overs for clark we were wrong an it could be déjà vu with Dawes.
Click to expand...


He's just as likely to extract his digit with the weight of that kind of responsibility and money and take the next step and be a 500K player
 
Now that Players are somewhat refrained from using their bodies in ruckwork it somewhat ups Martins value especially to us. Jamar's entire ruckwork game is built off wrestling players out of the contest and wining the tap, Stefan Martin doesn't have the body to do that but he has the height and leap, he'll be needed along side Gawn if these changes stick.
 
Bangonballsup said:
That just doesn't make sense, you can't pau someone 500K and try to pass them off as pick 20 value o_O
Click to expand...
Even if that figure is correct there's a big difference between Dawes' value to Melbourne and his value to Collingwood. To Melbourne he's that 2nd big forward who will hopefully take the pressure off Clark and provide a balanced forward structure for the first time in many years. It's worth Melbourne's while to pay him enough that we remain his club of choice. To Collingwood he's a surplus player who they decided to replace with a second rate 28yo. Melbourne only need to pay Collingwood something commensurate with his worth to them. Pick 20 sounds about right to me.
 
Bluelegs said:
Now that Players are somewhat refrained from using their bodies in ruckwork it somewhat ups Martins value especially to us. Jamar's entire ruckwork game is built off wrestling players out of the contest and wining the tap, Stefan Martin doesn't have the body to do that but he has the height and leap, he'll be needed along side Gawn if these changes stick.
Click to expand...
Make a thread about this mate, very valid point. This is similar to when they introduced the circle which killed of Whitey and Steven King.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

hoddo said:
To Collingwood he's a surplus player who they decided to replace with a second rate 28yo. Melbourne only need to pay Collingwood something commensurate with his worth to them. Pick 20 sounds about right to me.
Click to expand...

That's not how it works, you are going to have to pay overs because he's contracted and as you pointed out far more important to you than us.. we've already got a flag out of him but he needed to be more of a forward/ruck than a pure forward for our setup because of Cloke

And don't diss the Q, his numbers are awesome, if he's got 2 years left in him we just got a bargain for nothing
 
High Flying Flag said:
Make a thread about this mate, very valid point. This is similar to when they introduced the circle which killed of Whitey and Steven King.
Click to expand...

Will do, give me a bit, though I've got a few things before I'll have time.

Edit: Threads up.
 
Clearly I disagree with your first point, but I didn't intend to diss Lynch. I like him as a player. But there's no denying he's a second rate forward .. not in the same class as Franklin, the Riewoldts, Cloke, Pavlich etc. True he probably has 2 years left in him but Dawes has maybe 7 or 8 years left and yet you prefer Lynch. Dawes is clearly surplus to Collingwood's needs now so they can either trade him for the best available deal, which appears to be our pick 20, or be stuck with him playing in the reserves at, what did you say? $280k per year?
 
Bangonballsup said:
That's not how it works, you are going to have to pay overs because he's contracted and as you pointed out far more important to you than us.. we've already got a flag out of him but he needed to be more of a forward/ruck than a pure forward for our setup because of Cloke

And don't diss the Q, his numbers are awesome, if he's got 2 years left in him we just got a bargain for nothing
Click to expand...

We don't have to do anything, Dawes would be a nice get but we aren't going to bend over for Collingwood just because he's contracted. They'll let Collingwood keep paying $280,000+ for Dawes to play in the reserves, that's fine with Melbourne.
 
Dez! said:
We don't have to do anything, Dawes would be a nice get but we aren't going to bend over for Collingwood just because he's contracted. They'll let Collingwood keep paying $280,000+ for Dawes to play in the reserves, that's fine with Melbourne.
Click to expand...

You do if you want something better than Pederson backing up Clark ;)

And you are already bending over offering him 500K so you may as well touch your toes for us
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bangonballsup said:
You do if you want something better than Pederson backing up Clark ;)

And you are already bending over offering him 500K so you may as well touch your toes for us
Click to expand...

Funny how the Herald Sun is the only one reporting that.

Even if it were true (which I seriously doubt), we are paying almost the bare minimum the AFL allow so it wouldn't be that detrimental to our cap situation with front-loading, back-loading etc.
 
Bangonballsup said:
You do if you want something better than Pederson backing up Clark ;)

And you are already bending over offering him 500K so you may as well touch your toes for us
Click to expand...

You keep acting like paypackets have anything to do with his trade value.
 
livnixon9 said:
I don't know why it is so hard to believe. Gary Lyon has made public discourse that Melbourne offered Dawes a massive contract last trade season numerous times. It was also mentioned in The Age that he was offered plus $450 k plus.

Do you think Dawes is going to be receptive to such a move if the same people that offered him plus $450 k last year only think he's worth less than that now?
Click to expand...

Garry Lyon tends to pump up the club more than it really needs to be. Like I said earlier I don't really have an issue with the money. I reckon most of our players get fairly average pay from an AFL standard, they can't really ask for much more after the performances they've put on. If we want to make a play for these types of players, frontload their contracts and then give our other players better contracts when they earn it, I'm happy for us to do that. We have to pay the full salary cap anyway.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dawes

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top