Dawson, MacArthur and Solomon - potential Constitution breaches

pazza

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Posts
31,476
Likes
5,414
Location
Hoppers Crossing
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Liverpool
Thread starter #1
Was just reading that 3 of the Liberal electees may have been in breah of the constitution, as they were serving local councillors at the time of the election.

Taken from today's Herald-Sun (yet not online):

Liberal MP Russell Matheson (MacArthur), Country Liberal Party's Natasha Griggs (Solomon) and the LNP's George Christensen (Dawson). The High Court challenge, has a one-in-four chance of winning, according to constitutional law expert George Williams
Far from over for either side.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Caesar

Ex-Huckleberry
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
23,138
Likes
7,869
Location
Tombstone, AZ
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
#5
It's a beat-up. The provisions preventing holders of an 'office of profit under the Crown' have only ever been applied to employees of state and federal governments in Australia. The local government aspect has never been tested in court, but it would be unlikely to stand up because local government are not directly responsible to a Minister of the Crown.

I am very surprised to see George Williams giving it such a high chance of success - I suspect once more experts start weighing in the odds will drop quite substantially. It's a legitimate challenge, but a long shot.
 

Caesar

Ex-Huckleberry
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
23,138
Likes
7,869
Location
Tombstone, AZ
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
#7
Seriously, I doubt it will be a problem. When I was at university, our ConLaw tutor did some research for one of the economics professors (who was also a local councillor) on this exact issue before he ran for state government. The conclusion was that it almost certainly wouldn't be a problem.

Local councillors have been running for state/federal office for decades. Heck, the NSW Member for Lake Macquarie used to also hold down the job of Mayor whilst he was sitting in State Parliament.
 

DeanoT

Premiership Player
Joined
May 12, 2008
Posts
3,788
Likes
1,120
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Celtic
#9
If I remember correctly, the same happened to Phil Cleary in Wills. I'm pretty sure the rules around eligibility for federal parliament are very rigid. Would not surprise me if the courts ruled their candidacy to be invalid.
 

jo172

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Posts
15,468
Likes
10,385
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
San Antonio, Redbacks
#10
If I remember correctly, the same happened to Phil Cleary in Wills. I'm pretty sure the rules around eligibility for federal parliament are very rigid. Would not surprise me if the courts ruled their candidacy to be invalid.
Huge factual differences in terms of Executive employment.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

jo172

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Posts
15,468
Likes
10,385
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
San Antonio, Redbacks
#14
Isn't local government effectively a quasi-state government institution?
Yes, but the thrust of the Court's decision in Willis was maintaining the separation of powers.

A teacher is a public servant member of the executive.

It would expand dramatically on this doctrine to have every local Councillor considered part of the State's executive government IMO.

Having said that, with the current attitude of the High Court anything is possible.
 

morgoth

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
18,801
Likes
5,049
Location
Beaumaris
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Collingwood
#15
Was just reading that 3 of the Liberal electees may have been in breah of the constitution, as they were serving local councillors at the time of the election.

Taken from today's Herald-Sun (yet not online):



Far from over for either side.
Getting desperate. Gillard could not beat the unelectable Abbott and so her fan boys start grasping at straws.
 

tandino

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Posts
9,226
Likes
4,780
Location
Showers Stand
AFL Club
Essendon
#16
There were questions of George Newhouse's eligibility to stand for election for the seat of Wentworth in 2007, primarily because of his position on the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales. It turns out that he was also Mayor of Waverley as well.

His legitimacy was never tested because, obviously, he wasn't successful.
 

jo172

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Posts
15,468
Likes
10,385
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
San Antonio, Redbacks
#20
Sounds like every institution is against the Liberals.
Not so much 'against the Liberals' as being liable to read things into the Constitution that just aren't there.

As each day passes the French court looks more like the Mason court and i expect the decisions in Tontani and Getup to further illustrate this.
 

Clay Davis

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
19,993
Likes
1,821
Location
ge
AFL Club
Fremantle
#21
Not so much 'against the Liberals' as being liable to read things into the Constitution that just aren't there.

As each day passes the French court looks more like the Mason court and i expect the decisions in Tontani and Getup to further illustrate this.
Yeh totally. It's mad.
 
Top Bottom