Dear Mr. Channel 7 Director

[Mr Ripper]

Why, oh why do you insist on showing the 'behind the goal' camera shot even though the player with the kick for goal is in a direct line with the regular camera on the wing?

------------------
Olmy knows best

 

[Bob_vic]

One will never know...

How about cutting back to the player who was kicking for goal, only to find out, when they cut back again that the ball was touched.

Bob

 

[eagleskickass]

And in a earlier Eagles games 7 stuffed up again by going to an add after a goal, having about 3 adds, coming back and finding out another goal had been scored. THIS IS CRAP. Get it right. In this regard I can't wait to see if the consortium gets it right

 

[Guest]

Yes Ripper I fully agree.

Just another 6 months of channel 7 incompetence then we'll see how footy should be covered.

 

[AlfAndrews]

One thing that always annoys me is that when a player is being carried off on a stretcher, or leaving the ground under the bloody nuisance rule, they DON'T cut to an ad. Instead they bore us shitless with the sight of a player in pain. If they ran an ad or two instead, they could have less ads at other times.

It's totally stuffed how they always cut to an ad when a goal gets scored. All sense of excitement or atmosphere gets lost.

Shit for brains. That's the problem, basically. Just a bad case of shit for brains.

------------------
**floreat pica**