- Jan 7, 2010
- 12,003
- 35,262
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Strikers
That’s the kinda colossal fu** up SoS would make
Oppo Camp Death Riding: Norf
- Thread starter Marcel Proust
- Start date
- Tagged users None
joelsyt
Brownlow Medallist
- Mar 11, 2016
- 22,610
- 58,866
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It’s funny cause it’s true.
Equus
????????????
gil's boys can't afford to let 'em fold. they need the numbers for telly purposes and he supports them.
they actually have quite a substantial untapped supporter base. a few wins and the great unwashed will return. a bit like us.
Nah. Members waiting too long. They all carked it. They're filler team.
_RT_
Hall of Famer
- Sep 17, 2006
- 44,911
- 83,934
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
Reckon Saints finish in the middle tier of the ladder, which probably means our second pick improves between 1-11 spots. Obviously the better we perform and the worse they go the better, but I wouldn't be expecting them to finish bottom 6 again.
The reason why the pies had to throw in the saints 2nd to move up was there was another team wanting our pick to select Bianco
Things fell our way but thinking the difference will be 6-7 spots in our favour but that might just be enough for us to bundle our 1st and 2nd with a team to get into a top 10/12 spot in 2020
Things fell our way but thinking the difference will be 6-7 spots in our favour but that might just be enough for us to bundle our 1st and 2nd with a team to get into a top 10/12 spot in 2020
A Banderas
All Australian
- Nov 2, 2019
- 776
- 4,138
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #31
saints will finish bottom 4
Ned_Flanders
Make me an Admin!
- Aug 22, 2009
- 77,158
- 142,364
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- 76'ers
I say we all chip in for a dwarf stripper dressed as a school girl with a bag of coke and send her down to Moorabbin to lock it in
What's the comparison of us and St Kilda's record since they beat us with gastro that time?
Heisenberg_
17🏆19🏆20🏆
You’d think so, but on the other hand they are St Kilda
- Oct 27, 2014
- 16,826
- 117,746
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I still hope the Saints beat Collingwood next season.
Dr Tigris
Brownlow Medallist
They are definitely a club that can produce the extraordinary. Hopefully the extraordinarily bad in 2020. I think they can improve. But they are also in that group of 10-16 where a minor slip = doom. Let's hope there's some soap on the floor and they go A over T
Senor M
SFAEW World Heavyweight Champion
I think St. Kilda are going to improve next year. In 2019 they finished 9-13 overall; but it's important to break it up into three sections.
Started the season 4-1
Middle of season 2-9
End of season 3-3
St. Kilda started the season well until injuries overcome their side and then rebounded late in the year when they changed coaches and got more of their squad back from injury. If St Kilda can get 22 games out of Geary, Carlisle, Hannebery & Roberton on top of their 2019 recruits they will be a significantly better team. IMO they could be a 12-14 win team next year.
Started the season 4-1
Middle of season 2-9
End of season 3-3
St. Kilda started the season well until injuries overcome their side and then rebounded late in the year when they changed coaches and got more of their squad back from injury. If St Kilda can get 22 games out of Geary, Carlisle, Hannebery & Roberton on top of their 2019 recruits they will be a significantly better team. IMO they could be a 12-14 win team next year.
sregit
Club Legend
How can win / loss be 12/14? 22 games. Or is that 12 to 14 wins? If so you're dreaming.
Senor M
SFAEW World Heavyweight Champion
12-14 wins.
That's only 3-5 more wins than St Kilda got last season & I fully expect St. Kilda to have a better run in the middle of the season in 2020 than they did in 2019.
- Aug 4, 2016
- 1,504
- 4,049
- AFL Club
- Richmond
and then have carlton supporters wanting to build monument for him. Blue skys….FFS.That’s the kinda colossal fu** up SoS would make
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #43
im leaning that way as well.
I really cant believe what they gave up for one of the biggest sheep dogs in the entire comp and to go with it hes one of the most overrated users of the ball in the comp as well.
I cant wait for the wrist slashing and vitriol that will spew forth from the Hill trade.
they had pick 6 it could have gone on any number of highly rated players who will be far better than Hill. It could even have gone on McAsey the most highly rated kpd in the draft
It all started with them trading pick 6 and 59 for 12 and 18 if they stopped there they would have done well Imagine any combination of Kemp, Stephens Dekoning the second best kpd in the draft or even a superb runner like Jeremy Sharp.
They then trade 12, 18 and a future 3rd for Howard a 23yo kpd, 32yo past it Ryder and pick 10. Again if they had stopped there it may have turned out fine pick 10 would have snared them any number of quality kids in the draft any of which id take in front of squib Hill and they have a ready to go tall defender.
They then caved in to Geelong losing Steven for pick 58 which they eventually gave up for Hill.
Then the hill trade came along. they gave up Acres, nd 10, nd 58, future 2nd, future 3rd and effectively steven for Hill and a future 3rd.Talk about being reamed.
They then traded Bruce arguably their best tall fwd and a bloke who had played damn good footy as a defender for picks 32 and 51. some may say a win but i dont get the logic to it.they werent exactly overflowing with proven tall fwds let alone mature ones.
They then trade you guessed it 32 76 and a future 3rd for An ordinary Zac Jones 56 and a future 4th
Then the 56 they get for jones they give to us for Dan Butler who i wont comment onto save arguments.
In all this they manage to trade out of a very even good draft having only pick 52,64 and a rookie pick.
After all that im asking have they really improved their list enough to climb the ladder or significantly improved it enough to maybe challenge for the 8. i dont think so but with what they have done they had better at least make the 8 id say.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #45
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Melbourne | 1.1 | 2.2 | 6.7 | 8.8 | 56 |
| St Kilda | 3.3 | 6.7 | 6.11 | 7.12 | 54 |
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #46
I'm going to invite Ricky Nixon via Twitter
- Mar 1, 2010
- 23,185
- 16,586
- AFL Club
- Richmond
he played well yesterday, Butler did
rfctigerarmy
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
They looked pretty impressive!
- Feb 13, 2011
- 10,889
- 13,732
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He's going to have a similar year to Lloyd last year.
- Mar 1, 2010
- 23,185
- 16,586
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I think we can nearly throw previous form lines out the window.
We almost need to start from scratch.
St Kilda looks good. The were alright at times against North to.
They have new players and more speed which clearly showed yesterday. Essendon with speed won again to albeit against Sydney
Its a new season but more importantly a new shortened format.
I would not be surprised if teams like St Kilda and Gold Coast with speed and youth bob up and challenge under the new contest which makes the premiership challenge that much more difficult and unpredictable.
Richmond could well have to win it a different way let alone with a different team if we win at all this year
We almost need to start from scratch.
St Kilda looks good. The were alright at times against North to.
They have new players and more speed which clearly showed yesterday. Essendon with speed won again to albeit against Sydney
Its a new season but more importantly a new shortened format.
I would not be surprised if teams like St Kilda and Gold Coast with speed and youth bob up and challenge under the new contest which makes the premiership challenge that much more difficult and unpredictable.
Richmond could well have to win it a different way let alone with a different team if we win at all this year
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Poll
