
Gysberts2Bate
Brownlow Medallist
Getting in early on this one
Even if it doesn't get done, still a perfectly acceptable thread. Should have one for every club.has the trade been done yet?
I'd be wanting to get involved in the Bonar situation.Be a little disappointed if we didn't scunge something back from GWS more than next year's first but I spose if no one wants to come
Would like to see us turn around and tell them not to bother if that's the case. We pick who we want and hopefully someone nominates Green before GWS' pick. Two top 5 ish talents this year instead of one. You'd think it'd be worth throwing a fringe player into the deal.Be a little disappointed if we didn't scunge something back from GWS more than next year's first but I spose if no one wants to come
It's also possible the bloke we want at 3 would still be available at 6 in which case next year's pick would be free.Would like to see us turn around and tell them not to bother if that's the case. We pick who we want and hopefully someone nominates Green before GWS' pick. Two top 5 ish talents this year instead of one. You'd think it'd be worth throwing a fringe player into the deal.
Sounds like you can throw a blanket over at least four players so even if we don't the guy we want at 3 the guy at 6 should have just as much scope. Would be madness not to do this deal.It's also possible the bloke we want at 3 would still be available at 6 in which case next year's pick would be free.
It's a good enough deal no matter what but GWS need it badly.Sounds like you can throw a blanket over at least four players so even if we don't the guy we want at 3 the guy at 6 should have just as much scope. Would be madness not to do this deal.
Maybe. No idea how much fun and games takes place with who clubs say or don't say they'll take. In any case, wouldn't pay much attention to it given there's nothing wrong with someone changing their mind and deciding to take another player, whether there was some manky verbal agreement or not. We can pick who we want at #3 (other than Rowell, Anderson, of course), whereas we might not be as happy with #6.It's also possible the bloke we want at 3 would still be available at 6 in which case next year's pick would be free.
Or you could not take it so seriously?I hate death riding threads. Wasn't a fan when Adelaide had one on us, and not a fan of this one. Just win the flag and who gives a ...
Ah, you Queenslanders and your Sydney jokes.Surprised their fan hasn't been in here flying the f** for them.
Yeah the trade won’t happen at this stage. I went way too early.I'd have thought the bigger issue would be that we don't actually hold any of GWS' future picks .... yet.
Surprised their fan hasn't been in here flying the f** for them.
Haha, honest typo that one ...Ah, you Queenslanders and your Sydney jokes.
Yeah, they seem to be quite content to go into next years draft with a significant points deficitYeah the trade won’t happen at this stage. I went way too early.
Hilarious though bc GWS essentially gave up 500 draft points trading 12 and 18 for 6 for literally nothing.
They won’t have a deficit. 6 will match a bid at 4. But it’s just ironic because 12 & 18 > 6 on points.Yeah, they seem to be quite content to go into next years draft with a significant points deficit
If they carried out the trade, it's win-win. It is known.They won’t have a deficit. 6 will match a bid at 4. But it’s just ironic because 12 & 18 > 6 on points.
I meant if they end up trading up to 3/4 ... their next pick is 40They won’t have a deficit. 6 will match a bid at 4. But it’s just ironic because 12 & 18 > 6 on points.
Just Weight man, we Gould still end up drafting a Young gun.This all just feels Serong