reimersworstguy
All Australian
Shuey is untouchable. Our only young mid with the tools to be a star.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But since we are specualting, my wife generally has a good instinct on things. she has been right a lot and of course wrong too. but i trust it enough. After giving her a list of names, including sheed, she feels we will recruit Matt Crouch.
thats as good as anyone else has posted here, apart from 1 or two. Incidently, why wouldnt we talk about other players like Crouch? he is "highly rated" (there goes my favourite pair of words again). Rated higher than Sheed.
Slower than Sheed, crap around the ground, average kick. Sure he's better than Sheed.
I'd really love us to pick him up, looks a ripper.Lewis Taylor would be perfect for us. Fast mid/HFF who could play next year.
I think he'll be going somewhere between our first and second picks so very unlikely we'll get him.
He said that players had lost faith in it but that they should believe in it because it's the right gameplan. Of course this was under a different coach to who we will have in the future. Doubt there's anything to that in the circumstances.Remeber he did say at the end of the season he/the players lost faith in the gameplan, could be something to that.
If Melbourne or GWS were offering us a pick in the top 5 for Shuey I'd take it
simon black? woah well why isnt he rated closer to pick no.1 then? every drafee around this time of year is compared to some sort of champion of the game. All top 30 picks are "highly rated". Otherwise they wouldnt be classed as top 30 18-year olds in the country, now would they? not like recruiters go "yeh we rate this other player highly, but we will draft this other one who we dont rate highly, just because we can". if he is simon black then i am all for drafting him. but lets not kid ourselves.
simon black? woah well why isnt he rated closer to pick no.1 then? every drafee around this time of year is compared to some sort of champion of the game. All top 30 picks are "highly rated". Otherwise they wouldnt be classed as top 30 18-year olds in the country, now would they? not like recruiters go "yeh we rate this other player highly, but we will draft this other one who we dont rate highly, just because we can". if he is simon black then i am all for drafting him. but lets not kid ourselves.
I know D&T board is speculative a little in itself, but since we are talking about the board, I I have seen D&T board. Been following it for at least 5 years (prior to actually having my own account). Two of the most knowledgable at the moment Knightmare and Chris 25 rate him about 16/17. They have form over last 5 years and there will be others to come. Now to me that doesnt scream out Simon Black. What the hell are the 15 prior to that? All must be Gary Abletts or something. In any case, Id have one of these. But if we draft Sheed and he actually becomes like Black, then I'll of course be very happy. why wouldnt I?
Have you watched Sheed play Galileo9?
Well firstly Knightmare actually has him as the 6th best player in the draft ATM in his power rankings (http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/knightmares-2013-phantom-draft.983436/).
Carrying on about how Sheed won't necessarily be Simon Black entirely misses my point which was that his ceiling is a lot higher than "Priddis at best", which is what you said. I'm not even suggesting we draft him I'm simply pointing out your depiction of him was wrong. Take you condescension elsewhere.
I would doubt he's in Coniglio's class though
Smannies, my issue isnt with sheed himself. as i have said, if we recruit him and ends up as simon black, i will be extremely happy. extremely. However, its not like sheed love ONLY comes from people who have seen him play. its most definately not. this is a running pattern for us every year. lets list them. garlett, chalwell, that aboriginal kid from up north. there was depression when these guys didnt get drafted!! not just from those that have seen these players play.
so, as I said, my issue is us latching onto a west australia EVERY YEAR purely because he is west australian. if sheed was victorian, i can guarantee you that this "simon black" wouldnt be talked about in such manner here. thats guaranteed. I mean after all, you don't get a simon black every day.
Id rather people read everything I have said in my posts and not just take it as anything sheed specific. I think my points about latching onto a west aussie purely because he is a west aussie is extremely valid. i dont know why as WCE clearly drafts the best in the country early on and isnt swayed by state. later picks ok.
That is unless you've watched him enough to be confident in your own assessmenthe is closer to being one of those vanilla midfielders like stevens than someone you think he is, whoever that might be. so far, with all the descriptions that people have put up, at best he is a priddis. slow, cant kick, good with hands. now priddis is good player but lets not forget, never an all australian. not even close.
actually he has him as pick 17 in his decriptions....
but if we want to talk about power rankings, matt crouch who is slower, worse kick and cant play around the ground according to easternhills is ranked 4th. by the way, i am more inclined to believe easternhills than Knighmare. Also Chris25's draft description. I have found his to be more on the mark than Knighmares.
Smannies, my issue isnt with sheed himself. as i have said, if we recruit him and ends up as simon black, i will be extremely happy. extremely. However, its not like sheed love ONLY comes from people who have seen him play. its most definately not. this is a running pattern for us every year. lets list them. garlett, chalwell, that aboriginal kid from up north. there was depression when these guys didnt get drafted!! not just from those that have seen these players play.
so, as I said, my issue is us latching onto a west australia EVERY YEAR purely because he is west australian. if sheed was victorian, i can guarantee you that this "simon black" wouldnt be talked about in such manner here. thats guaranteed. I mean after all, you don't get a simon black every day.
Id rather people read everything I have said in my posts and not just take it as anything sheed specific. I think my points about latching onto a west aussie purely because he is a west aussie is extremely valid. i dont know why as WCE clearly drafts the best in the country early on and isnt swayed by state. later picks ok.
Have heard a rumour (from a nobody, so holds no water) that Smith is heading back to Vic. What would he be worth?
Anything less than 2nd round pick is probably not worth it, might as well keep him and hope he comes good.
I think the very best we can hope for is upgrade of picks.Have heard a rumour (from a nobody, so holds no water) that Smith is heading back to Vic. What would he be worth?
Anything less than 2nd round pick is probably not worth it, might as well keep him and hope he comes good.
I think the very best we can hope for is upgrade of picks.
If we're very lucky perhaps our 3rd for someones 2nd.
He's not worth a 2nd rounder on its own currently.
Smith is worth two-fifths of...
Remeber he did say at the end of the season he/the players lost faith in the gameplan, could be something to that.
If Melbourne or GWS were offering us a pick in the top 5 for Shuey I'd take it
But since we are specualting, my wife generally has a good instinct on things. she has been right a lot and of course wrong too. but i trust it enough. After giving her a list of names, including sheed, she feels we will recruit Matt Crouch.
thats as good as anyone else has posted here, apart from 1 or two. Incidently, why wouldnt we talk about other players like Crouch? he is "highly rated" (there goes my favourite pair of words again). Rated higher than Sheed.
That's not why I was asking Galileo9. I had similar reservations about him until I made a point to watch him at an U18s match, a couple in fact. Then I formed a stronger opinion.
Kambalda Saints description above is pretty accurate. I would describe him as a priddis type, but more dynamic in traffic.
you are kidding arent you? this sheed crap going on over last 5 months is pissing me off. he is closer to being one of those vanilla midfielders like stevens than someone you think he is, whoever that might be. so far, with all the descriptions that people have put up, at best he is a priddis. slow, cant kick, good with hands. now priddis is good player but lets not forget, never an all australian. not even close.