TradeDraft
Post-Human
Interesting. Don't know a lot about him but he seems a good player. Should be on a list next year it seems.
There are others I'd take over him though
And can Sign Him instead of Drafting Him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting. Don't know a lot about him but he seems a good player. Should be on a list next year it seems.
There are others I'd take over him though
We're pretty harsh on him. Only 2 years back in the game.He's coming from a very low base and I can't recall a time where I walked away from a game thinking he'd won the duel with his direct opponent (s) during the match.
Looks distinctly undersized and doesn't have much of a leap, or good enough timing to use what leap he does have, to overcome the height disadvantage he is usually faced with, which is a surprise considering you'd think he has some hops coming from a basketball background.
Still he has another year to move himself and anything could happen I guess.
We're pretty harsh on him. Only 2 years back in the game.
Having said that, i think we're barking up the wrong tree by looking for talls as Cat B. Its all about reading the ball flight and im pretty confident that that comes from years of kicking tbe footy.
I just think that if you look at the crossover players, there's been some very good footballers, but i cant think of one that I'd describe as being a good mark.I agree we are harsh on Magden - if only he were an inch or two taller.
Regarding Cat B rookies - Keane is looking very promising, well ahead of where we thought he'd be from some reports.
Tohill has some real agility and plenty of tricks, although we haven't seen as much from him in terms of consistent footy yet.
Then there's the wunderkind - Wilson is also showing some good signs. If at least two out of the three kick on then it's a very good result for us. If all three of them do so then it's a very exciting time for the club over the next 5-6 years.
I thought he not Available to be on a List Next Year?
I thinks that is right Dave, a delisted player stays "active" for 3 years after delisting without the need to re-nominate for a draftAnd can Sign Him instead of Drafting Him
He's coming from a very low base and I can't recall a time where I walked away from a game thinking he'd won the duel with his direct opponent (s) during the match.
Looks distinctly undersized and doesn't have much of a leap, or good enough timing to use what leap he does have, to overcome the height disadvantage he is usually faced with, which is a surprise considering you'd think he has some hops coming from a basketball background.
Still he has another year to move himself and anything could happen I guess.
Club has a history of forgive and forget.Feel like bloody Murray might come good at another club
Club has a history of forgive and forget.
He has done something that they don’t like.
So good luck to him elsewhere.
Riccardi come
How does Collingwood get Tom Boyd on our list? Is it possible? A player who would make our forward set up close to,if nor elite!The simple rule is, by taking an “exposed form“ AFL player, will they be a best 22?
If yes, go for it.
If no, then it’s a pass.
That simple.
(caveat is if it’s a necessary depth for specialty position, like a spare ruck.)
Did you watch him on open mike a few weeks back? He will never play AFL again.How does Collingwood get Tom Boyd on our list? Is it possible? A player who would make our forward set up close to,if nor elite!
Never say never.Even if he was on a good wage I don't think he would be resented by the Collingwood players,like the doggies players did because of his big salary.Did you watch him on open mike a few weeks back? He will never play AFL again.
His words not mine. I thought he made it pretty clear in the interview it wouldn’t happen. Good interview btw, worth the watch. Mental health issues are tough.Never say never.Even if he was on a good wage I don't think he would be resented by the Collingwood players,like the doggies players did because of his big salary.
He just doesn’t like AFL Football (the system, the pressure, the demands, the scrutiny).How does Collingwood get Tom Boyd on our list? Is it possible? A player who would make our forward set up close to,if nor elite!
We're pretty harsh on him. Only 2 years back in the game.
Having said that, i think we're barking up the wrong tree by looking for talls as Cat B. Its all about reading the ball flight and im pretty confident that that comes from years of kicking tbe footy.
400k apparentlyThe emergence of Keane and the recruitment of Kelly (if he's to be used in defense in 2020) allows that. As a Cat B, he costs nothing to retain.
Ladies and Gents I have one to add to the thread. Mitch Brown from Essendon has been delisted.
Liked Dixon in his draft year but he was pretty raw. Understandable they are going to rookie him.Mitch Brown is an interesting one, although perhaps a little too similar to Mihocek.
If recent history with list selection is any indication the one we will pick up is Hugh Dixon.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Ladies and Gents I have one to add to the thread. Mitch Brown from Essendon has been delisted.