ScrewInStuds
Club Legend
- Mar 24, 2013
- 2,096
- 5,362
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Miami Heat
Now that we're a few years into his tenure and there's a decent body of work to compare, how do people see the difference in the leadership of Demetriou and Gil?
For mine, Demetriou was a much stronger leader - you may not have agreed with all of his decisions, but at least you were left with no doubt that he was the one making them. The implementation of teams in GWS and Gold Coast showed real vision in the face of widespread scepticism.
The main feather in Gil's cap is the latest TV rights deal which has injected huge amounts of dollars into the game, BUT the recent example of Clarkson asking for a favour on Monday and receiving an AFL directive in his favour on Tuesday makes Gil come across as very weak, and able to be dictated to by powerful factions within the Victorian footy scene. This seems to be backed up by a real lack of leadership re: the Goodes booing saga and the the Essendon drugs saga.
So, how do you see the differences in leadership of the two most recent head honchos?
For mine, Demetriou was a much stronger leader - you may not have agreed with all of his decisions, but at least you were left with no doubt that he was the one making them. The implementation of teams in GWS and Gold Coast showed real vision in the face of widespread scepticism.
The main feather in Gil's cap is the latest TV rights deal which has injected huge amounts of dollars into the game, BUT the recent example of Clarkson asking for a favour on Monday and receiving an AFL directive in his favour on Tuesday makes Gil come across as very weak, and able to be dictated to by powerful factions within the Victorian footy scene. This seems to be backed up by a real lack of leadership re: the Goodes booing saga and the the Essendon drugs saga.
So, how do you see the differences in leadership of the two most recent head honchos?