Demons sorry for ‘distress’ caused by meeting with players’ partners
Melbourne have responded to reports they discussed Steven May’s alleged personal issues during a phone hook-up between club bosses and the partners of players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

ADE v GEE · HAW v WB · NM v FRE · GCS v BL · WCE v PA · SYD v StK · ESS v CAR · COL v MEL ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Geez he must be a proper campaigner
Absurd take. Maybe if you dont want people to know you are a tool then dont act like one...![]()
Demons sorry for ‘distress’ caused by meeting with players’ partners
Melbourne have responded to reports they discussed Steven May’s alleged personal issues during a phone hook-up between club bosses and the partners of players.www.watoday.com.au
No chance. A part of his free 800,000 would be waiving the right to sue for sureJust finished compulsory privacy data course at uni. This is basic 101 stuff and sheer stupidity from Demons. May and his partner could sue them and win easily.
Im sure the Dee's lawyer's are already preparing for a case, If not a out of court settlement.Just finished compulsory privacy data course at uni. This is basic 101 stuff and sheer stupidity from Demons. May and his partner could sue them and win easily.
We obviously don't know May's settlement contract but sharing private info outside the organisation, how stupid is that from the club? And it's not only May and his partner who could sue them or go after them. Plenty of government bodies oversee this area.No chance. A part of his free 800,000 would be waiving the right to sue for sure
LOL at govt body overseeing anything to do with workers rights.We obviously don't know May's settlement contract but sharing private info outside the organisation, how stupid is that from the club? And it's not only May and his partner who could sue them or go after them. Plenty of government bodies oversee this area.
. Im up to my eye balls helping a friend out in a FWC case for a govt body were his boss told him he was too ugly to be gay, got a warning and then called him a stupid homo and they both got fired over it when my friend yelled at him about it (for "raising his voice") . What does it have to do with May privacy breach?LOL at govt body overseeing anything to do with workers rights.
Can you tell the W.A govt. Im up to my eye balls helping a friend out in a FWC case for a govt body were his boss told him he was too ugly to be gay, got a warning and then called him a stupid homo and they both got fired over it when my friend yelled at him about it (for "raising his voice") .
They are still fighting it in court
The govt is doing absolutely nothing is what im saying.... They will side with Demons for sureWhat does it have to do with May privacy breach?
Obviously, uni is not the club but I would be fired on the spot if I did what Richardson/club did.
I personally don't like May but jeez this is flagrant breach of privacy. Like it or not.
Just because some bureaucrat is a moron, doesn't mean the courts don't have teeth.LOL at govt body overseeing anything to do with workers rights.
Can you tell the W.A govt. Im up to my eye balls helping a friend out in a FWC case for a govt body were his boss told him he was too ugly to be gay, got a warning and then called him a stupid homo and they both got fired over it when my friend yelled at him about it (for "raising his voice") .
They are still fighting it in court
So he belted her up, and the head honchos got all the girls together to let them know the new brass wouldn't let it slide?
Geez he must be a proper campaigner
The private "information" was factually incorrect anyway.I think the most important question is - was May’s partner consulted prior to this meeting and gave her permission for this private personal information related to her to be shared in this forum? Because if not (and seems like not), that’s ****ed.
Yeah nah.
You might waive your right to sue in relation to the contract but not everything and this is well outside of the contract.
A payout doesn't mean it's a free for all for Melbourne to carry on anyway they like outside the law.
What if Richardson went on television and called May a pedo?
Clearly may can sue if Richardson said something untrue.
May has a long history of beating up women. His current partner wanting to keep it quiet is up to her, but don't falsely claim he is innocent.No. This is not what happened at all. May was cleared of any wrongdoing and is still with his girlfriend.
May has a long history of beating up women. His current partner wanting to keep it quiet is up to her, but don't falsely claim he is innocent.
Melbourne and the AFL covered up May beating up his previous partner, it seems that the new leaders wanted to make it clear to players partners that they won't stand for this, and one of the players partners ran to the media to cause a drama.
If even some of the rumours are true then I'm not sure May would want to be cross examined.Im sure the Dee's lawyer's are already preparing for a case, If not a out of court settlement.
Stupid situation to find themselves in.



