Remove this Banner Ad

Detailed look at our 2003 line-up

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

snakebite01

Premiership Player
Aug 9, 2002
4,353
123
London
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Spurs
Backs: Hart Bassett Bickley

This line is the ultimate consistecy line. The full-back and pocket positions will change around for match-ups depending on who we are playing but these three should give us a lot of run and drive from the last line of defence, where our attack starts. Expect Bickley to have a bigger role in defence if body can't stand up to the strain of constant midfield battle but will also still be used on rotation in the middle.

Half-backs: Smart McGregor Torney

Once again the half-back line should provide us with a lot of run through Smart and Torney and this could prove to be a rock of a back 6. Smart may get a manning-up job or a running job depending on the opposition but Torney could be the real quiet acheiver, roaming the half-back line in the mould of a Montgomery for Port Adelaide. Crowell could be stiff opposition to these three as could John(ock but hopefully these three can form a formidable partnership.

Centre: Bode Riccuito Stenglein

The centre line once again looks very strong with the skillful Bode and workman like Stenglein on the wings and Riccuito in the centre to dish out some drive and physical presence. These positions will be rotated highly throughout games with the likes of Doughty and Ladhams to challenge for spots as may Burton if he is moved up the ground. Stenglein may possibly go into the centre for a tagging role in some circumstances but next year I have a feeling he may start to play a more attacking role if there is no key player to be tagged.

Half-forward: Welsh Stevens Edwards

These three are three of the most underrated players in the competiton but could easily cause headaches for opposition coaches. With the marking target of Stevens there, anything he doesn't grab, Edwards will swoop on and Welsh can play either a marking role or a crumbing role. This will prove to be either our big weapon or our downfall depending on the form an/or injuries of these three however IMO it is more likely to be our weapon. Rotations such as Ladhams, Burton, John(ock, McLeod, Riccuito, Burns etc. could occur on this line which provides us with a lot of depth.

Full-forward: Burns Carey Burton

A formidable line for any team. this provides us with the brilliance of Carey, the athleticism of Burton and the crumbing skills of Burns. As with the half-forward line these three could play multiple roles - Carey as the strong marker, Burns as the crumber and Burton as either depending on which we need him most. An excellent line if all players are fit and firing and this will no doubt be one of the most crucial lines in our team. All are capable of kicking 40+ goals if they are in form but we will have to keep them fit, focused and in form.

Rucks: Biglands Goodwin McLeod

Surely our biggest and best line in the team, this would be close to the best midfield in the league when you add Riccuito to it. McLeod is near unstoppable even with multiple taggers and the run and drive of Goodwin will no doubt be essential. Biglands can only get better and with excellent support from Clarke we will be well served in the ruck. Expect Mcleod to turn on an outstanding year considering his 2002 where he was consistent without being brilliant. A lot of rotation will occur on this line.

INT: Clarke Mattner Ladhams John(ock

A good young interchange to be a part of the midfield rotation. John(cok can play anywhere if he is needed and Ladhams can provide us with goalscoring opportunites if we need. Clarke will be an excellent assistance to Biglands and Mattner will thirve after another pre-season and will again do the 1%'s and the hard things.

Crowell, Massie, Doughty, Gallagher, Rutten and others very unlucky to miss out yet they will no doubt be used during the year and will get their chance to prove that they want to be a part of something special.

All looks good for season 2003 provided we stay relatively injury-free if the team puts in a great pre-season and the hunger is still there which it no doubt will be.
 
Originally posted by snakebite01

Crowell, Massie, Doughty, Gallagher, Rutten and others very unlucky to miss out yet they will no doubt be used during the year and will get their chance to prove that they want to be a part of something special.

What sort of role will Rutten play?
 
Re: Re: Detailed look at our 2003 line-up

Originally posted by DaveW


What sort of role will Rutten play?

May play a defensive role if he is required or could even go forward if needed. This all hinges on the fact if he is fit, had a good pre-season and is required.
 
Originally posted by snakebite01
Backs: Hart Bassett John(ock


Half-backs: Smart McGregor Bickley


Centre: Ladhams Riccuito Stenglein


Half-forward: Welsh Stevens Edwards


Full-forward: Burns Carey Burton


Rucks: Biglands Goodwin McLeod


INT: Clarke Mattner Torney Bode


All looks good for season 2003 provided we stay relatively injury-free if the team puts in a great pre-season and the hunger is still there which it no doubt will be.



Made a couple of adjustments which i would go as a starting line up, ie= starting Ladhams & John**** in the 18 otherwise pretty much the same as yours, as you say some unlucky guys to miss out but thats what we want.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I hope they don't play Burton up forward. I'd much rather see him on a wing where he can use his athleticism to best advantage.

On a wing he could outmark and outrun most opposition one on one. I think he was only used up forward last year after Fitzy went down and there was no-one else.
 
I'll give this a go, see what I come up with

Backs :- Hart, Bassett, Edwards

H/Backs :- Massie, McGregor, Smart

Centre :- Doughty, Ricciuto, Burton

H/Forward :- Bode, Stevens, Goodwin

F/Forward :- Welsh, Carey, Burns

Rucks :- Biglands, Stenglein, McLeod

I/Change :- Clarke, Johnco(k, Bickley, Hentschel

Emerg :- Torney, Ladhams, Mattner


Didn't like putting in Burns, I reckon he's now a dud hack, but you recruited, so you gotta play him. I'd prefer Ladhams or Johnco(k to grow into that goal shark role. Massie actually looked pretty good on occasion last season, so I reckon he's a walk up start
 
Originally posted by Asgardian
I'll give this a go, see what I come up with

Backs :- Hart, Bassett, Edwards

H/Backs :- Massie, McGregor, Smart

Centre :- Doughty, Ricciuto, Burton

H/Forward :- Bode, Stevens, Goodwin

F/Forward :- Welsh, Carey, Burns

Rucks :- Biglands, Stenglein, McLeod

I/Change :- Clarke, Johnco(k, Bickley, Hentschel

Emerg :- Torney, Ladhams, Mattner


Didn't like putting in Burns, I reckon he's now a dud hack, but you recruited, so you gotta play him. I'd prefer Ladhams or Johnco(k to grow into that goal shark role. Massie actually looked pretty good on occasion last season, so I reckon he's a walk up start

We don't gotta play Burns. Unlike with Carey we didn't go all out to get him, we just picked him up for a small price. If he fits into the side great, if he doesn't, no biggie. Burns will be a fringe player, IMO. Massie was good this year but Ladhams was better.
 
Burns better not be a fringe player.
We didnt draft him just so as he can lounge in a comfort zone.
Id expect him to be in our starting line up every week earning his keep and vindicating the club for choosing him.

If he doesnt kick 40 goals or more this coming season .....seeya later:(
He wont do that OUT of the starting lineup
 
Originally posted by topjars
Burns better not be a fringe player.
We didnt draft him just so as he can lounge in a comfort zone.
Id expect him to be in our starting line up every week earning his keep and vindicating the club for choosing him.

If he doesnt kick 40 goals or more this coming season .....seeya later:(
He wont do that OUT of the starting lineup
If we get 2 goals per game out of Rockin Ronnie, I will be more than happy (& if he avoids anymore soft tissue injuries).
 
Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
If we get 2 goals per game out of Rockin Ronnie, I will be more than happy (& if he avoids anymore soft tissue injuries).

Defintely, if we can spread the goals evenly around our forwards, like for instance two goals each a match then we will post big scores considering our midfield tend to kick a lot of goals.

I'm quietly confident that the King and Third degree will have good seasons (Carey more so than Burns) so long as they have a good run with injuries and can keep themselves on the park.
 
Talls

This was posted by Rodan on the Richmond board. I was suprised that we had one of the tallest sides (considering our lack of rucks) in 2002, & probably have the most tall now Port has got rid of French, Brooks & S Bassett.

If my AFL guide is accurate...this is how many talls each club took into season 2002. a tall is anyone taller than 190 cms.

Adelaide- 15
Brisbane - 9
Carlton - 12
Collingwood - 15
Essendon - 14
Fremantle - 14
Geelong - 15
Hawthorn - 10
Melbourne - 13
North - 13 : including U NO HOO.
Port - 16.
Rich - 9...now 8.
St.Kilda - 14
Sydney - 15
WCE - 13
Western Bulldogs - 14
 
Well as of right now (draft(s) still to come obviously), we still have 15.

Angwin (200), Fitzgerald (199), Finnin (190) are gone. But they are replaced by Bock (193), Rutten (192) and Carey (192).

But as far as ruckmen go, Marsh (201), Biglands (199) and Clarke (198) are the only players over 193cm.

It's interesting that Fitzgerald is as tall as Biglands. Did he ever play ruck in his younger days at South Adelaide? I guess that would be a big ask of him these days after all the injuries he's had.

Edit:
We're actually down to 14. Forgot to include Hewitt (193). These figures are from AFL 2002. My footy record from the prelim final has Fitzy as 201! And Marsh at the Shaun Rehn-esque 203.
 
Re: Re: Detailed look at our 2003 line-up

Originally posted by DaveW
What sort of role will Rutten play?
He should be developed into the 2nd key tall defender we need. Bassett really struggles when we come up against a team with 2 tall forwards & is better taking a medium size player.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Spogs
I hope they don't play Burton up forward. I'd much rather see him on a wing where he can use his athleticism to best advantage.

On a wing he could outmark and outrun most opposition one on one. I think he was only used up forward last year after Fitzy went down and there was no-one else.
I agree that Burton should be playing further up the ground - either off a wing or HF flank. He can then run all over the place to lose his opponent & float in for the occassional screamer. He is too easily marked @ FF & goes missing too much.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Detailed look at our 2003 line-up

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top