Shiel Be Right
Senior List
- Sep 13, 2016
- 166
- 171
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Banned
- #76
Would he be in either sides best 22 with injuries?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cool, even tho he will be better then all them
Would he be in either sides best 22 with injuries?
He'd be ahead of McGlynn based on last week.At the start of the year i'd have had him in instead of Hewett, but Hewett has had a really solid first season so in hindsight.. maybe?
What draft tampering would that be exactly????You mean like what you did to secure TOYD?
Cheers for that btw....tamper on.
we would have been happy to have him, but as Kennedy slows down, Heeney and Mills will go into the middle and we will look for a small forward and a half back flankerMay come to regret it as Kennedy slows down, but Dunks is readymade. I'm very happy to have him.
Agreed and his kicking still needs a little work. But it is ok at the moment.
Would he be in either sides best 22 with injuries?
Heeney's situation is a bit like Stringer for us, in that his full potential lies in the midfield but it'd mean losing a deadly weapon closer to goal.we would have been happy to have him, but as Kennedy slows down, Heeney and Mills will go into the middle and we will look for a small forward and a half back flanker
What's this rubbish about going back on their word? How about not giving him their word in the first place? How about saying "we're taking you whether you like it or not", just like every other player that's forced to move interstate? Something Sydney have done numerous times before.All those suggesting Sydney go back on their word and match the Dogs bid for him you must pretty untrustworthy people. No way the Swans were going to do that.
Because Sydney were the ones with the discount deal. Other teams had to use a second rounder, they just had to downgrade two picks in the 50s.Not sure why the Swans are copping all the heat here. Every club (just about) had the option to select him - why arent their recruitment teams in the spotlight?
Fair point, but the argument is made because (in true BF fashion) his last game was good and therefore they made a mistake not getting him. Well, isnt that true of all the clubs who had the chance and over looked him ?Because Sydney were the ones with the discount deal. Other teams had to use a second rounder, they just had to downgrade two picks in the 50s.
What's your point?#happywithpappy!!
How many goals did Dunks kick last night?
What's your point?
Papley was a rookie selection. Dunkley went in the national draft, following which the Swans drafted Tyrone Leonardis and Jordan Dawson (?). Recruiting one had nothing to do with the other.
So you don't understand the father son system.What's this rubbish about going back on their word? How about not giving him their word in the first place? How about saying "we're taking you whether you like it or not", just like every other player that's forced to move interstate? Something Sydney have done numerous times before.
We made a mistake passing on Picken.