Autopsy Did the new 6-6-6 rule cost Carlton

greatwhiteshark

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Posts
9,598
Likes
8,602
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
West Perth
#26
Seriously, bigfooty has almost been reduced to a permanent work-shopping session for the whinge-alots to test half baked brain f4rts on why the noo rules are bad
Reckon it’s more of a reflection on where the game is at with the fans now. The AFL simply don’t get it that the fans are increasingly becoming disenchanted with the game.
There is simply way to much talk about rules and umpiring for it to be just simply whinging.
Fortunately the AFL are very lucky as the fans keep turning up, any other sport in the world where an organisation stuffed around with the game as the AFL has for the last 20 years would see crowds deteriorate.
What happened to just discussing why you won or lost.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Golden_6

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Posts
3,768
Likes
6,114
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
#27
Is this a joke thread? Carlton had more numbers around the ball at the time of the goal and even had a spare sitting ‘near’ the goalsquare. The simple ineptitude of McGovern getting sucked towards the ball is what cost Carlton.
 
Top Bottom