I haven't agreed with bazzar here, but I don't think you have any clue about crickey based on this
If you're going to make a blanket statement at least give a modicum of evidence your argument. I played cricket for a dozen years, got to district level. Or maybe you're referring to Crikey, a fine online newspaper. You should subscribe to it, you might learn something.
Also stop peddling this "moral justification" crap. Frankly, most people do not morally justify food. Morals are different from person to person. I have no moral issue eating meat, just like none of us here morally justify why we use products that are produced overseas for minimal cost and payment to employees. What's important to your morality, has no bearing on anyone else in the world. It's completely subjective (and as I've said numerous times before, moral discussion has no place on this board. Take it to SRP)
Just because most people do something doesn't make it right, unless you want to give your blessings to suffrage, segregation and slavery.
It may not be a consideration for the majority, but if a harm causing practice is easily avoidable, why not?
I will stop bringing up morality when you guys stop giving arguments that are just flat out stupid like the one below.
If everyone on the planet stopped eating any animal products period, what would happen to all the farm animals? How do they contribute to the survival of the human race? We'd have to rely on plant foods which the animals will be after too. Eventually would we have to resort to hunting all the cows and chickens of the world to extinction? .... dun dun dun
95% of animal biomass worldwide is now humans or things domesticated by humans. Mass extinction is happening now and it's primarily caused by habitation destruction for animal agriculture. You can eat all the current animals, just stop breeding them.
Diet is one of the first things questioned when players start underperforming
Of course a small sample size doesn't mean the results didn't happen. It means that there are questions around the validity and applicability of results. What a stupid strawman.
Do you feel a compulsive need to quote everything I say but add nothing to the conversation. I get that you're still somewhat hurt by that one time I answered you without glowing affection, but sooner or later you should try to get over it.