- Joined
- Feb 19, 2002
- Posts
- 7,736
- Reaction score
- 347
- Location
- Richmond
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

- Other Teams
- Fitzroy
Tonight I saw a woman beating up a young child outside a shopping centre (I assume it was her own child). When I say "beating up", I don't mean merely smacking the child, but rather, bashing the child (and the child's head) into a car and hitting and slapping the child as well. Of course, this was accompanied by very abusive yelling, a lot of which would make a football crowd look like a tea-party by comparison.
Worse still, was that when confronted, the woman and another female friend both tried to justify their behaviour and became extremely abusive towards myself and a security guard who attempted to intervene. I guess this is not surprising, however, the fact that they seem to feel vindicated in their actions, despite the degree of violence, disturbed me quite a lot.
The child would have been no older than 3 or 4 (at the very most). Given that the child seemed to be screaming quite loudly before hand, I assume that there must have been some sort of issue to bring the parent to a high level of annoyance. However, given the scenes that followed, I wouldn't be surprised if the parent had a hand in originally bringing the child to such a distraught state.
This wasn't just a case of a parent maybe taking things a little too far, or losing their temper just a little too much. It wasn't a case of a "smack" coming off too hard due to a strained temperament. It was a case of serious physical abuse.
The woman had totally lost the plot. She was incapable of seeing that her actions were WAY out of line, and I doubt she had even thought or cared for the consequences in a worsened scenario.
I can't believe that such scumbags exist. People talk of terrorists, who facelessly wreak havoc on others. However, I tend to think that the people who I saw tonight are of an even lower scum. How could anyone, no matter what the circumstances, beat up such a young child, and then turn around and try to justify themselves and abuse those who try to intervene? How could anyone believe that belting a child, so young, senseless as being a suitable solution to behavioural problems? And these people still think they are good parents? Hasn't 'our' world been educated against such practices?
If people can't handle children without having to resort to such measures, then it is obvious that they SHOULD NOT have any access to children what-so-ever.
Worse still, was that when confronted, the woman and another female friend both tried to justify their behaviour and became extremely abusive towards myself and a security guard who attempted to intervene. I guess this is not surprising, however, the fact that they seem to feel vindicated in their actions, despite the degree of violence, disturbed me quite a lot.
The child would have been no older than 3 or 4 (at the very most). Given that the child seemed to be screaming quite loudly before hand, I assume that there must have been some sort of issue to bring the parent to a high level of annoyance. However, given the scenes that followed, I wouldn't be surprised if the parent had a hand in originally bringing the child to such a distraught state.
This wasn't just a case of a parent maybe taking things a little too far, or losing their temper just a little too much. It wasn't a case of a "smack" coming off too hard due to a strained temperament. It was a case of serious physical abuse.
The woman had totally lost the plot. She was incapable of seeing that her actions were WAY out of line, and I doubt she had even thought or cared for the consequences in a worsened scenario. I can't believe that such scumbags exist. People talk of terrorists, who facelessly wreak havoc on others. However, I tend to think that the people who I saw tonight are of an even lower scum. How could anyone, no matter what the circumstances, beat up such a young child, and then turn around and try to justify themselves and abuse those who try to intervene? How could anyone believe that belting a child, so young, senseless as being a suitable solution to behavioural problems? And these people still think they are good parents? Hasn't 'our' world been educated against such practices?
If people can't handle children without having to resort to such measures, then it is obvious that they SHOULD NOT have any access to children what-so-ever.





.