Not that I want to be critical. And I've had a few pints mind you. However, does it seem to you all, as it does to me, that Bluey has decided of his own to appoint a moderator for the Lions board? Similarly, this decision seems to come straight behind the decision not to sanction a Roys board.
Danni is an excellent choice mind you, however, was this just an autocratic decision, or something that was gauged on opinions aired on this forum?
It kinda irks me a bit - also, when you consider that PUBLIC OPINION also called for a ROYS BOARD ON BIGFOOTY.
After all, while Bluey does a great job as 'head moderator', it is the contributors who make this site great.
I can only say that a Roys page would make this site even better (more contributors, etc.).
Then again, should we all be empathising with Bluey in view of all the complaints he has already received about a Roys board (mind you, probably all 50 of them have come from the same one or two people with 20 different e-mail addresses)?
Danni, hope you do well as the moderator. IMO, you should do something about the number of nonsense posts on this board. I'm not one to legislate against what people can or can't post, however, when extreme goes to extreme, something has to be done (thus my suggestion for a moderator in the first place).
Danni is an excellent choice mind you, however, was this just an autocratic decision, or something that was gauged on opinions aired on this forum?
It kinda irks me a bit - also, when you consider that PUBLIC OPINION also called for a ROYS BOARD ON BIGFOOTY.
After all, while Bluey does a great job as 'head moderator', it is the contributors who make this site great.
I can only say that a Roys page would make this site even better (more contributors, etc.).
Then again, should we all be empathising with Bluey in view of all the complaints he has already received about a Roys board (mind you, probably all 50 of them have come from the same one or two people with 20 different e-mail addresses)?
Danni, hope you do well as the moderator. IMO, you should do something about the number of nonsense posts on this board. I'm not one to legislate against what people can or can't post, however, when extreme goes to extreme, something has to be done (thus my suggestion for a moderator in the first place).
