NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2006
- Posts
- 93,684
- Reaction score
- 115,568
- Location
- Flaggy, Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt - Nuggets - 49ers
What'd the AFL say about the overturned soligo goal ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

ADE v GEE · HAW v WB · NM v FRE · GCS v BL · WCE v PA · SYD v StK · ESS v CAR · COL v MEL ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Why would they say anything? It was the right call?What'd the AFL say about the overturned soligo goal ?
Was it ??Why would they say anything? It was the right call?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ball goes over the goal post being called a behind has been precedent for 129 years.Was it ??
Precedent certainly set then hey !
Ask em if they’ve ever won a game after having a shot for goal actually hit the post and be called a goal?Ball goes over the goal post being called a behind has been precedent for 129 years.
Apart from the fact it got called a goal heyBall goes over the goal post being called a behind has been precedent for 129 years.
This is a funny thread
It’s like the Crows have never been advantaged by dodgy umpiring decisions in close games.
Are you saying the goal umpires are infallible?Apart from the fact it got called a goal hey
I'm saying the precedent's been setAre you saying the goal umpires are infallible?
Which would you prefer, that the Goal umpires word is final? Or that the ball going over the Post is called a behind?I'm saying the precedent's been set
I'd prefer campaigners in the arc wouldn't go on vibes, apparently even that's too much to ask going by your reactionWhich would you prefer, that the Goal umpires word is final? Or that the ball going over the Post is called a behind?

Did you even look at the replays? Or just decide it had to be a goal becuase a Crow kicked it?I'd prefer campaigners in the arc wouldn't go on vibes, apparently even that's too much to ask going by your reaction![]()
You only have to watch the 2012 preliminary final to know the answer to that question.
You saw an angle no one else did ?Did you even look at the replays? Or just decide it had to be a goal becuase a Crow kicked it?
Show me the angle where is goes between the posts. Prove the arc wrong. We've already agreed the goal umpires are useless.You saw an angle no one else did ?
You're not ARC guy by any chance ??
There's an angle where it didn't ?Show me the angle where is goes between the posts. Prove the arc wrong. We've already agreed the goal umpires are useless.
Ah so you admit, you didnt watch the replays that the arc used, you just decided they must be wrong.There's an angle where it didn't ?
Where'd i say that ?Ah so you admit, you didnt watch the replays that the arc used, you just decided they must be wrong.
You wouldnt be shocked that the Footage showed it went over the post, if you had watched the footage.Where'd i say that ?
I hate misinformation being so lazily spread.Why you so pissy about this btw ?
I say it wasAdelaide have been screwed over by poor umpiring decisions - the ARC call on friday just wasnt one of them. You dont need to make up errors to make your point.
Just saying it doesnt make it so.I say it was