Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Autopsy Dogs Breakfast v Dogs

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

What are you on about. Most would've had us losing to Port, Melb and Sydney and smashed by the Hawks going into the season with the list we had. And coming away with the 4 points against the Eagles and North (who were older than us at the time of playing them btw) is still better than losing to them like some have. It's only cos we've notched those wins that your expectation and thus bar has risen as such. Get reaaaaaaal mate.

my expectations are very low.

but acting like beating West Coast and North by under a goal is a good effort is simply polishing a turd.

We are a turd, I know we are a turd, just telling you to stop trying to polish it.

you do you though
 
Wait. I thought it was Scott's fault? Now it's the players' fault? Did they not execute Brad's elite game plan?

You can be snarky, or you can read my reply to you literally two minutes ago that said it was a mix of skill, effort and coaching.

Except you're apparently obtuse enough to think that Scott is blameless, or that the cattle are solely to blame for a 90 point belting, or a player getting 46 uncontested possessions isn't even remotely the fault of the coach/gameplan, so that'll probably fall on deaf ears.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

my expectations are very low.

but acting like beating West Coast and North by under a goal is a good effort is simply polishing a turd.

We are a turd, I know we are a turd, just telling you to stop trying to polish it.

you do you though

You're confusing polishing with being realistic. At this point it just seems like you're being melty as a coping mechanism.
 
You're confusing polishing with being realistic. At this point it just seems like you're being melty as a coping mechanism.

my expectations were bottom 4, we are playing like a bottom 4 team and are on track to meet my expectations. barely beating North and the Eagles literally confirms how bad we are.

how exactly am I not being realistic?
 
Stopped watching at half time, but I'd be lying if I said alarm bells shouldn't be ringing internally. I know we're not a gun side but we do not play with any dare or run at all. Even Hawks a couple years ago were doing that. Bombing down the line to Kako and Merrett at FF is not going to work.

Also, forward structure/coaching is diabolical. Have we got Dan Jordan 2.0 at the helm?
 
my expectations were bottom 4, we are playing like a bottom 4 team and are on track to meet my expectations. barely beating North and the Eagles literally confirms how bad we are.

how exactly am I not being realistic?
But are we bad enough to lose to the Tigs? Or are we worse in where we are that bad we will beat them by a small margin?
 
But are we bad enough to lose to the Tigs? Or are we worse in where we are that bad we will beat them by a small margin?

The tigers can absolutely beat us.
 
Stopped watching at half time, but I'd be lying if I said alarm bells shouldn't be ringing internally. I know we're not a gun side but we do not play with any dare or run at all. Even Hawks a couple years ago were doing that. Bombing down the line to Kako and Merrett at FF is not going to work.

Also, forward structure/coaching is diabolical. Have we got Dan Jordan 2.0 at the helm?

But didn't you hear Brad Scott mention in the press conference that we played attacking football in the second half? Even though anyone with eyes knows that we are one of the most boring and conservative sides in footy.

I think our lack of foot skills, speed and fitness is alarming. I knew we were nowhere near the top sides in these areas, but I didn't realise the gap was as bad as it is.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

But didn't you hear Brad Scott mention in the press conference that we played attacking football in the second half? Even though anyone with eyes knows that we are one of the most boring and conservative sides in footy.

I think our lack of foot skills, speed and fitness is alarming. I knew we were nowhere near the top sides in these areas, but I didn't realise the gap was as bad as it is.

I mean this is exactly where I sit.

I knew we are a very bad side, but the talent and intensity difference between us and the dogs was alarmingly wider than even I thought.

brads comments about 8 year rebuild is actually a scary reality right now.
 
You can be snarky, or you can read my reply to you literally two minutes ago that said it was a mix of skill, effort and coaching.

Except you're apparently obtuse enough to think that Scott is blameless, or that the cattle are solely to blame for a 90 point belting, or a player getting 46 uncontested possessions isn't even remotely the fault of the coach/gameplan, so that'll probably fall on deaf ears.
"Brad's elite game plan" while focusing on one player isn't snarky?
Good work.
 
But didn't you hear Brad Scott mention in the press conference that we played attacking football in the second half? Even though anyone with eyes knows that we are one of the most boring and conservative sides in footy.

I think our lack of foot skills, speed and fitness is alarming. I knew we were nowhere near the top sides in these areas, but I didn't realise the gap was as bad as it is.
Yeah I know that raised my eyebrow. They should have done after the 1st qtr. he has done it before so he can do it (as a coach) He did it against the pies this year and we got back in front. In his first year he was way more flexible n regards to changing up the gameplan but this year he seems more rigid and less reluctant to do so.
 

And they’ve turned it around ibc they’ve got arguably the smartest mind in the game, who restructured their list & got them playing a ruthless & uncompromising brand.

We have a coach who doesn’t have us playing any identifiable way in the same timeframe as Mitchell, nor has us in a better position than Rutten did.

Thanks for amplifying that fact with your misguided research.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

But didn't you hear Brad Scott mention in the press conference that we played attacking football in the second half? Even though anyone with eyes knows that we are one of the most boring and conservative sides in footy.

I think our lack of foot skills, speed and fitness is alarming. I knew we were nowhere near the top sides in these areas, but I didn't realise the gap was as bad as it is.
Yeah, our skills and fitness are shocking. There has been zero improvement in key areas of the playing group. Brad's into his 3rd year now, we should have developed some noticeable game plan by now at the very least. Bombing down the line won't cut it.
 
But are we bad enough to lose to the Tigs? Or are we worse in where we are that bad we will beat them by a small margin?
Because the media will be on us because we were full Essington, we probably beat them.

Knowing us though and the fact Richmond are actually trying, we probably lose by 5 goals.
 
Mate what are you on about. Most would've had us smashed by the Hawks and losing to Port, Melb and Sydney going into the season with the list we had.

And coming away with the 4 points against the Eagles and North (who were older than us at the time of playing them) is still better than losing to them like some have.

It's only cos we've notched those wins that your expectation and thus bar has risen as such. Get reaaaaaaal mate.
seen several of your posts praising the last 5 weeks we've had, how is it any different to previous years of beating wce/north/melb and even WB? for years now we've bearly beaten west coast/north and we're still struggling. there's literally been 0 improvement over the past 3 years
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Autopsy Dogs Breakfast v Dogs

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top