- Oct 9, 2013
- 10,892
- 14,789
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
It's not a good thing that he's getting pinged but it's to be expected, so it's not really a bad thing either. I think that's all most are saying. He'll be learning from it.Some of the stuff you read on this thread...
I mean I like Bailey Williams as well, but the mental quantum leaps required to turn the actual, on-field events of getting caught holding the ball three times in the match as "good signs because he's a thinking player" or something like that quite extraordinary (let alone 13 people liking the post). I mean people know me on this board, I like to analyse things, but at some point you have to call a spade a spade, and Bailey Williams getting caught 3 times holding the ball first and foremost to me represented the fact that he got caught holding the ball a lot.
I mean, when watching the game, were people really thinking "he's showing thought and poise"? I thought to myself "here's a player whose weakness in his lack of acceleration over his first 2-3 steps might get him into trouble into the future".
I don't understand why. Is it an inverse of the whole draft pick thing? The theory that high draft picks get unfairly criticised early in their career is now the opposite for a late pick for Williams? That it's not somehow fair to call a weakness in his game a weakness in his game because we should have low expectations because he wasn't a high draft pick?
It's normal for a creative player like Williams who likes to hold the ball and assess the situation to get pinged for a while as he's adjusting to the change of pace. He'll eventually learn the difference between VFL and AFL is holding onto the pill that extra half second. I think someone mentioned Griffen and it's a good example. Although Griffen would be creative by breaking the line with run rather than ball use (or both), the theory is the same. At the start of his career he got pinged a lot before he learned how much time he actually had.