So how can they look everyone in the eye and say ‘yeah Gold Coast can bid on their top elite kids, but you guys can’t?They were
Like I can’t understand that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So how can they look everyone in the eye and say ‘yeah Gold Coast can bid on their top elite kids, but you guys can’t?They were
Assuming all three picks are tradeable this year, the overall points situation is enough to move the dial I reckon.Three first rounders is not nothing...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's arguably a better deal for GC. Two picks next year as opposed to throwing away all the picks this year.Lmfao, can’t even out bid Dogs to get pick 4 from GC…
So no pick 11 & no sanders?
Shafted again. Grubs.
And the kid costs more and a three year contract?Is it 3 end of first round picks or 3 start of second round picks. The only difference is that we can use them on draft night 1 instead of draft night 2.
Is it 3 end of first round picks or 3 start of second round picks. The only difference is that we can use them on draft night 1 instead of draft night 2.
Yes I think you might be right.Interesting. I somewhat optimistically interpreted that as meaning "trade them now... or else".
What if they are called three start of second rounds, but a night early?Not sure you can say three first round picks is a shafting.
I think we can do what we want with them. If we keep extra rookie spots then 2 uncontracted players might get a reprieveNo we have them already is my understanding. They can be "reviewed" but surely we can trade them