Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Draft Discussion 2016

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

What about Galluci? Seems to be what we need - a mid with pace. Being compared to JJ from Bulldogs in terms of pace.

2nd behind McLuggage in terms of goals kicked avg and assists avg

Would have thought he would be in the conversation at 23 if he is still available
Definitely in the conversation. Unlikely to still be there however. Expected to go 15-20.
 
Last edited:
i agree mate, well said!
Looking forward to see who we get in the draft, I'm pretty sure they will get the best available for each of our 3 picks, also you never know what our team is organizing.
Also can't wait for the season to start, with Steele and Carlisle in the team, with natural improvement from our young guys we should really shake up things next year.
 
Looking forward to see who we get in the draft, I'm pretty sure they will get the best available for each of our 3 picks, also you never know what our team is organizing.
Also can't wait for the season to start, with Steele and Carlisle in the team, with natural improvement from our young guys we should really shake up things next year.
Seriously exciting year! No excuses. I hope its the year we really slay some sides and the toughness in this group comes out each week
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It really makes no difference where our pick ends up as academies and father sons aren't available to us anyway. Probabaly a good thing that clubs will be forced to used picks on them before our picks as it pushes the other kids back to us.
I just look at what happened with Josh Dunkley. If you like "Player A" make a bid on him you never know how the other club feels about them.
 
Josh Kennedy( Sydney)
Patrick Cripps ( Carlton)
Lachie Neale ( Fremantle)
Patrick Dangerfield ( Geelong)
Mat Priddis ( West Coast )
Ollie Wines ( Port )
Garry Ablett ( GC )
Jack Viney ( Melb )
Rory Sloane ( Adelaide )
Dustin Martin ( Richmond )
Scott Pendlebury ( Collingwood )
Stephen Coniglio ( GWS )

These are contested ball winning freaks who average at least 12 contested possessions per game.
Some teams have more than one.
We don't have any.

Sydney 1 0
Adelaide 5 3
GWS 4 1
Bulldogs 7 3
Cats 2 3
Melbourne 11 5
Port 10 3
Collingwood 12 4
North 8 1
West Coast 6 4
Fremantle 16 5
Richmond 13 1
Lions 17 4
Suns 15 1
Saints 9 7
Blues 14 2
Bombers 18 1
Hawks 3 15
Is the contested Ball ladder. The numbers are the Premiership ladder position, and the difference between ladder and contested ball ranking.
If we ignore the wacky situation of the Hawks. It seems likely that winning the contested ball is more likely to get us into the 8.
( 5 of the to 8 ball winning teams were in the actual 8 ).

I don't want us to choose a speedy outside mid who can't get contested possessions. Even outside mids need to be able to win their own ball.
 
Josh Kennedy( Sydney)
Patrick Cripps ( Carlton)
Lachie Neale ( Fremantle)
Patrick Dangerfield ( Geelong)
Mat Priddis ( West Coast )
Ollie Wines ( Port )
Garry Ablett ( GC )
Jack Viney ( Melb )
Rory Sloane ( Adelaide )
Dustin Martin ( Richmond )
Scott Pendlebury ( Collingwood )
Stephen Coniglio ( GWS )

These are contested ball winning freaks who average at least 12 contested possessions per game.
Some teams have more than one.
We don't have any.

Sydney 1 0
Adelaide 5 3
GWS 4 1
Bulldogs 7 3
Cats 2 3
Melbourne 11 5
Port 10 3
Collingwood 12 4
North 8 1
West Coast 6 4
Fremantle 16 5
Richmond 13 1
Lions 17 4
Suns 15 1
Saints 9 7
Blues 14 2
Bombers 18 1
Hawks 3 15
Is the contested Ball ladder. The numbers are the Premiership ladder position, and the difference between ladder and contested ball ranking.
If we ignore the wacky situation of the Hawks. It seems likely that winning the contested ball is more likely to get us into the 8.
( 5 of the to 8 ball winning teams were in the actual 8 ).

I don't want us to choose a speedy outside mid who can't get contested possessions. Even outside mids need to be able to win their own ball.

Good post - so based on this who would you want us to take with pick 23?

I also think Stevens will help and Steele in particular as he plays more will be instrumental here - a tall mid who is an extractor...
 
Good post - so based on this who would you want us to take with pick 23?

I also think Stevens will help and Steele in particular as he plays more will be instrumental here - a tall mid who is an extractor...

They'll both help but Stevens averages around 8 contested possessions a game and Steele averages 5. Steele is young though so too early to write him off as a contested ball beast.

We need a lot to go right if we want to keep bringing in "speedy outside mids" that everyone wants every year. We need Acres to go from averaging 6 to at least 10, Dunstan and Ross to go from 8 to 10 and Armitage to find his 2015 average of 12 at an absolute minimum. If all that happens then we might be alright but I'd much rather keep searching for a 12+ guy. We have enough run, carry and skill guys, what we need is guys who can get it to them.
 
They'll both help but Stevens averages around 8 contested possessions a game and Steele averages 5. Steele is young though so too early to write him off as a contested ball beast.

We need a lot to go right if we want to keep bringing in "speedy outside mids" that everyone wants every year. We need Acres to go from averaging 6 to at least 10, Dunstan and Ross to go from 8 to 10 and Armitage to find his 2015 average of 12 at an absolute minimum. If all that happens then we might be alright but I'd much rather keep searching for a 12+ guy. We have enough run, carry and skill guys, what we need is guys who can get it to them.

Agreed. Steele too early to call but I think he will come good. Improvement has to come from within as per what you've said above.

This missing piece has to be the free agent doesn't it? Fyfe, Martin etc, (not that I'm saying we'll get them). I'd like Rory Sloane....
 
Good post - so based on this who would you want us to take with pick 23?

I also think Stevens will help and Steele in particular as he plays more will be instrumental here - a tall mid who is an extractor...

I'm not so sure.
PP wins a bit of it i think ( the best outside mid's win the ball too, I put Joey in that category ), by contrast i've heard Florent described as a "very outside" mid, meaning he doesn't.
Latest rumours are that PP could go earlier rather than later, but i'm not sure who will slide in his place.
Plenty of inside mids in the draft but will they be better extractors or would we simply getting another Dunstan ( which wouldn't help us much ).

One thing to remember is that there are contests all around the ground, and while GWS's best , Coniglio only averages 12 cp's per game, the team as a whole does way better than Carlton who put all their eggs in the Cripps basket. ( even though Cripps averages around 17 a game he can't kick it to himself ).
 
They'll both help but Stevens averages around 8 contested possessions a game and Steele averages 5. Steele is young though so too early to write him off as a contested ball beast.

We need a lot to go right if we want to keep bringing in "speedy outside mids" that everyone wants every year. We need Acres to go from averaging 6 to at least 10, Dunstan and Ross to go from 8 to 10 and Armitage to find his 2015 average of 12 at an absolute minimum. If all that happens then we might be alright but I'd much rather keep searching for a 12+ guy. We have enough run, carry and skill guys, what we need is guys who can get it to them.

Looking at a few games.
I see one game where Sinclair was one of the worst but so was Dunstan.
Then the next game , Sinclair won comfortably more of the ball than Ross.
So yeah consistency a factor.
 
Armitage, Steven, Ross, Dunstan, Steele, Stevens, Acres, Gresham. If we're not able to win a lot more contested ball next year with them- and then more again the following year- I'd be very surprised, especially as I'm expecting Armo to bounce back, if he actually has a preseason this time and stays relatively injury-free. Stevens has also shown that when he actually gets to play on ball he consistently wins 10+ (averaged 11 per game for his last 5 full games of 2015- when it looks like he was clearly playing mostly on the inside- and was well on the way to 15 or so (7 from just 24% game time) until he got injured, in the next game (which he didn't return from that year).

We have a shit-tonne of salary cap space and at least 3 first rounders (as of right now) as trade assets for next year's trade period. If in 8-12 months it looks like we still need to add a "contested beast", then surely we throw the kitchen sink at one in next year's trade/FA period, rather than drafting someone who will probably just be another that's no better than those we already have- and probably take 2-4 years to really come on.

What else are we going to spend our huge amount of salary cap space on?

I'd much rather make Jacob Hopper (who had 86 contested to 87 uncontested in his first year and 17 contested in his very first game!) an offer he won't refuse and actually get someone who will probably be our best in the midfield going forward, than draft someone that probably won't be much better than a Dunstan/Steele/Stevens/Ross type (who were all taken/bid on between 15 and 25 in their respective drafts).

That said, I liked Clarke when I saw him play and at least he has excellent endurance (so crucial these days) and there is talk that he's close to 190cm now, so if we drafted him I'd be perfectly happy to have him at our footy club.

SPP of course is one that brings both contested ball winning ability and speed (and endurance, and size, and goalkicking) to the table. Yum.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Armitage, Steven, Ross, Dunstan, Steele, Stevens, Acres, Gresham. If we're not able to win a lot more contested ball next year with them- and then more again the following year- I'd be very surprised, especially as I'm expecting Armo to bounce back, if he actually has a preseason this time and stays relatively injury-free. Stevens has also shown that when he actually gets to play on ball he consistently wins 10+ (averaged 11 per game for his last 5 full games of 2015- when it looks like he was clearly playing mostly on the inside- and was well on the way to 15 or so (7 from just 24% game time) until he got injured, in the next game (which he didn't return from that year).

We have a shit-tonne of salary cap space and at least 3 first rounders (as of right now) as trade assets for next year's trade period. If in 8-12 months it looks like we still need to add a "contested beast", then surely we throw the kitchen sink at one in next year's trade/FA period, rather than drafting someone who will probably just be another that's no better than those we already have- and probably take 2-4 years to really come on.

What else are we going to spend our huge amount of salary cap space on?

I'd much rather make Jacob Hopper (who had 86 contested to 87 uncontested in his first year and 17 contested in his very first game!) an offer he won't refuse and actually get someone who will probably be our best in the midfield going forward, than draft someone that probably won't be much better than a Dunstan/Steele/Stevens/Ross type (who were all taken/bid on between 15 and 25 in their respective drafts).

That said, I liked Clarke when I saw him play and at least he has excellent endurance (so crucial these days) and there is talk that he's close to 190cm now, so if we drafted him I'd be perfectly happy to have him at our footy club.

SPP of course is one that brings both contested ball winning ability and speed (and endurance, and size, and goalkicking) to the table. Yum.


I'm pretty happy if we have several guys who can win 8 as much as it would be nice to have one who can get 12+ contested possessions. If you have one gun it's easier to sit on them. We have a good spread of competent contested ball mids now and plenty with massive scope to step it up a level. I can't see Hopper being easy to prise free from them either but you can only try. If we keep offering money to players eventually one will shake free.
 
Just had a look at Zac Fisher, and I like what I see. Small but, he moves well in contested ball packs, seems to be able keep his feet in the tackle, good vision, decent disposal and apparently a solid clearance player. The next Lachie Neale?
 
I'm pretty happy if we have several guys who can win 8 as much as it would be nice to have one who can get 12+ contested possessions. If you have one gun it's easier to sit on them. We have a good spread of competent contested ball mids now and plenty with massive scope to step it up a level. I can't see Hopper being easy to prise free from them either but you can only try. If we keep offering money to players eventually one will shake free.
There's talk from someone on here who I believe has good contacts that Hopper actually wants to come and play his footy in Melbourne, so he might be the easiest to prise out of there of the lot. There'll be plenty of competition for his signature if he does in fact ask for a trade to a Melb club in 12 months, but very few clubs are in as strong a position to get a trade done and offer him pretty much whatever it will take as we are, so if we really, really wanted him, it would just be a matter of doing what it takes to get it done- as long as it's not crazy overs.
 
Armitage, Steven, Ross, Dunstan, Steele, Stevens, Acres, Gresham. If we're not able to win a lot more contested ball next year with them- and then more again the following year- I'd be very surprised, especially as I'm expecting Armo to bounce back, if he actually has a preseason this time and stays relatively injury-free. Stevens has also shown that when he actually gets to play on ball he consistently wins 10+ (averaged 11 per game for his last 5 full games of 2015- when it looks like he was clearly playing mostly on the inside- and was well on the way to 15 or so (7 from just 24% game time) until he got injured, in the next game (which he didn't return from that year).

We have a shit-tonne of salary cap space and at least 3 first rounders (as of right now) as trade assets for next year's trade period. If in 8-12 months it looks like we still need to add a "contested beast", then surely we throw the kitchen sink at one in next year's trade/FA period, rather than drafting someone who will probably just be another that's no better than those we already have- and probably take 2-4 years to really come on.

What else are we going to spend our huge amount of salary cap space on?

I'd much rather make Jacob Hopper (who had 86 contested to 87 uncontested in his first year and 17 contested in his very first game!) an offer he won't refuse and actually get someone who will probably be our best in the midfield going forward, than draft someone that probably won't be much better than a Dunstan/Steele/Stevens/Ross type (who were all taken/bid on between 15 and 25 in their respective drafts).

That said, I liked Clarke when I saw him play and at least he has excellent endurance (so crucial these days) and there is talk that he's close to 190cm now, so if we drafted him I'd be perfectly happy to have him at our footy club.

SPP of course is one that brings both contested ball winning ability and speed (and endurance, and size, and goalkicking) to the table. Yum.

The best thing SPP would bring is that Luke Hodge style grunt and aggression (that f/you jack attitude), which apart from Mav we lack through the midfield. He would make other quiter natured players like Ross, Billings and Sinclair walk so much taller. SPP 15-20 disposals will be as important as a 30 give and go disposal getter, because he will physically hurt the opposition eg Hodge and you cant measure that!
 
Because of a change at work this year I haven't had anywhere near the opportunity to watch the draft prospects.
To the experts on here can you tell me where Josh Rotham ends up positionally as a player? Could he play the third tall defender role? Does he last to our first selection?
Reminds me a lot of a young Sam Gilbert in the way he plays.
You'd think he'd hold some interest to us if he is still on the board at 23.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

T
Because of a change at work this year I haven't had anywhere near the opportunity to watch the draft prospects.
To the experts on here can you tell me where Josh Rotham ends up positionally as a player? Could he play the third tall defender role? Does he last to our first selection?
Reminds me a lot of a young Sam Gilbert in the way he plays.
You'd think he'd hold some interest to us if he is still on the board at 23.
o me he seems like the sam as Elliot Yeo was at the same stage, Probably not as dominant a ball winner but very simmilar.
 
T

o me he seems like the sam as Elliot Yeo was at the same stage, Probably not as dominant a ball winner but very simmilar.
I read a comporaison to K Kolo from the Suns, any similarities?

Also how do Rotham and Ridley compare?
 
Because of a change at work this year I haven't had anywhere near the opportunity to watch the draft prospects.
To the experts on here can you tell me where Josh Rotham ends up positionally as a player? Could he play the third tall defender role? Does he last to our first selection?
Reminds me a lot of a young Sam Gilbert in the way he plays.
You'd think he'd hold some interest to us if he is still on the board at 23.


Have watched him play quite a few times , my feeling with the type of kid he is the go home factor is pretty high.

If club wanted a tall quick defender around our pic , I would not hesitate to pick Brennan Cox who whilst being
a South Australian think would be ideal.

I really hope we pick someone with potential to be anything. Cedric Cox
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom