Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Draft Discussion 2016

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-10-13/callum-twomeys-phantom-form-guide-october-edition

Based on that we're not in a good position. These are his rankings (not picks):

1: McLuggage
2: McGrath
3: Ainsworth
4: Brodie
5: Bowes (academy)
6: Petrevski-Seton
7: Setterfield (academy)
8: Taranto
9: Perryman (academy)
10: Scrimshaw
11: English
12: Marshall
13: Berry
14: Logue
15: Simpkin
16: Witherden
17: Venables
18: Florent
19: Gallucci
20: Bolton

So based on that, there's a good chance all the top pure mids are gone before our pick. (Not to mention three academy prospects which could make us more like 13).

Between 10 and 16 are talls who we don't need (English, Marshall), project players who might become mids (Scrimshaw, Berry, Logue), guys who barely played this year (Simpkin, Witherden). Then we're down to a bunch of inconsistent prospects (Venables, Florent, Gallucci, Bolton, etc).

If that's a roughly accurate guide then we should either trade down or up. A pick inside 10 would be great, but seems unlikely. So the other option is going up the order to have a couple of picks around 20 - we've had success with that in the past.
Well said.
Not looking great at this point.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Fair enough.

I'll be stoked if we pick up either with pick 10, especially Simpkin
Looking at some of his vision looks to have genuine tricks through the midfield.
People will doubt getting another small but with the acquisitions of Steele and Stevens it's not as bad.
Does he have pace? Probably something we need
 
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-10-13/callum-twomeys-phantom-form-guide-october-edition

Based on that we're not in a good position. These are his rankings (not picks):

1: McLuggage
2: McGrath
3: Ainsworth
4: Brodie
5: Bowes (academy)
6: Petrevski-Seton
7: Setterfield (academy)
8: Taranto
9: Perryman (academy)
10: Scrimshaw
11: English
12: Marshall
13: Berry
14: Logue
15: Simpkin
16: Witherden
17: Venables
18: Florent
19: Gallucci
20: Bolton

So based on that, there's a good chance all the top pure mids are gone before our pick. (Not to mention three academy prospects which could make us more like 13).

Between 10 and 16 are talls who we don't need (English, Marshall), project players who might become mids (Scrimshaw, Berry, Logue), guys who barely played this year (Simpkin, Witherden). Then we're down to a bunch of inconsistent prospects (Venables, Florent, Gallucci, Bolton, etc).

If that's a roughly accurate guide then we should either trade down or up. A pick inside 10 would be great, but seems unlikely. So the other option is going up the order to have a couple of picks around 20 - we've had success with that in the past.

Id be happy with any 2 from 14 to 20!.
 
They aren't top 10 quality and both have quite large doubts.
Rubbish.

Logue's insane athleticism at 194cm puts him in the same frame as Michael Hurley (who went Pick 5), and Simpkin was very much in the top 10 discussion before he missed the entire season with a broken leg.
 
Rubbish.

Logue's insane athleticism at 194cm puts him in the same frame as Michael Hurley (who went Pick 5), and Simpkin was very much in the top 10 discussion before he missed the entire season with a broken leg.
Where will he play at afl level, key back or midfield?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rubbish.

Logue's insane athleticism at 194cm puts him in the same frame as Michael Hurley (who went Pick 5), and Simpkin was very much in the top 10 discussion before he missed the entire season with a broken leg.

Simpkin is an interesting one. Darcy Tucker was touted as a potential number 1 prior to his U18 season and ended up at 27.
 
Rubbish.

Logue's insane athleticism at 194cm puts him in the same frame as Michael Hurley (who went Pick 5), and Simpkin was very much in the top 10 discussion before he missed the entire season with a broken leg.

Legit been told sydney want him bad! Maybe this is the reason why they want to move up.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

But if that's where they're rated you'd think that's about where they'd go. I would be happy to take Rotham or Florent around 15 if we had that pick.
It's on form mate, Twomey's said a few times it's not got much bearing on where they'll go.

BA's on IF is the same.
 
It's on form mate, Twomey's said a few times it's not got much bearing on where they'll go.

BA's on IF is the same.

Surely if it's on recent form then Taranto and Florent would have to be higher?! Florent dominated his last 2 games and Taranto has been kicking goals as well as playing time as a mid.
 
Where will he play at afl level, key back or midfield?
Probably key back, but Rance/Hurley rather than Mackenzie/Lonergan.
 
Updated draft order with selections:

P1 - Ess - McLuggage
P2 - GWS - McGrath
P3 - GC - Bowes (matched bid)
P4 - Bris - Ainsworth
P5 - Carl - Brodie
P6 - Rich - Taranto
P7 - Freo - English
P8 - GC - SPS
P9 - Port - Scrimshaw
P10 - StK - Berry
 
Updated draft order with selections:

P1 - Ess - McLuggage
P2 - GWS - McGrath
P3 - GC - Bowes (matched bid)
P4 - Bris - Ainsworth
P5 - Carl - Brodie
P6 - Rich - Taranto
P7 - Freo - English
P8 - GC - SPS
P9 - Port - Scrimshaw
P10 - StK - Berry
Can you factor in likely bump-downs because of Academy picks?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom