Recruiting Draft Watch 2020

[eDPS]

Spoiler: eDPS 2020 Phantom Draft

Spoiler: Lore's 2020 Draft Order

Any issues with the below please tag Lore in this thread: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2020-future-pick-tracker.1229399/unread/

Spoiler: Draft Central Draft Guide

 

[Red Black and Blue]

WTH is that??? Henry before Thilthorpe and DGB?? Rioli and Coleman in the top 10. Are half of them taking the piss?

It is what it is. If you rate someone that high take them. If someone had taken Will Day

12

Will Day

Age

24

Ht

191cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

2star

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

4star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

2star

CL

0.5

3star

D

17.5

5star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

3star

there last year, people would have said the same, only 12 months on and I doubt the Hawks would be trading him for anyone other than Rowell from that top ten.

 

[Lore]

Is there a BF phantom happening this year eDPS? I think I read it was planned for after trade period but that's gone and we're only three weeks away now.

There's one happening now https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...draft-and-rookie-draft-period.1250286/page-11

I mean the usual one with the serious draft watchers.

WTH is that??? Henry before Thilthorpe and DGB?? Rioli and Coleman in the top 10. Are half of them taking the piss?

It’s in the works, might be started next week

It is what it is. If you rate someone that high take them. If someone had taken Will Day

12

Will Day

Age

24

Ht

191cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

2star

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

4star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

2star

CL

0.5

3star

D

17.5

5star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

3star

there last year, people would have said the same, only 12 months on and I doubt the Hawks would be trading him for anyone other than Rowell from that top ten.

The official one is in the works, yeah. Just waiting on lists to be finalised as that usually affects a few things, like list needs and ordinarily also the draft order (not this year).

 

[Haychh]

It is what it is. If you rate someone that high take them. If someone had taken Will Day

12

Will Day

Age

24

Ht

191cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

2star

D

17.5

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

4star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

2star

CL

0.5

3star

D

17.5

5star

K

10.0

4star

HB

7.5

5star

M

5.0

5star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.5

3star

there last year, people would have said the same, only 12 months on and I doubt the Hawks would be trading him for anyone other than Rowell from that top ten.

Fair enough but Day was always around the top 10-15, Fair chance Rioli goes in the rookie draft.

FWIW I'd trade Anderson, Serong or Green for Day.

 

[andleanback]

Looks like we can take 3 top 10s and both academy boys

 

[citizen-erased]

Looks like we can take 3 top 10s and both academy boys

+1 more.
either a super late pick. or we split a top 10 into 2x later picks

 

[andleanback]

+1 more.
either a super late pick. or we split a top 10 into 2x later picks

Or maybe they might target a delisted free agent from somewhere. Matt kennedy been delisted

 

[citizen-erased]

Or maybe they might target a delisted free agent from somewhere. Matt kennedy been delisted

ah yep.
Matt Kennedy would be funny for the lols....also the timing feels interesting there.

 

[Dons4Life]

Looks like we can take 3 top 10s and both academy boys

I would be surprised if their preference isn't to take 2 top 10s and trade the other with pies for 16 and their future 1st and then take the 2 academy kids.

 

[andleanback]

I would be surprised if their preference isn't to take 2 top 10s and trade the other with pies for 16 and their future 1st and then take the 2 academy kids.

Yeah we could do that, but either way we’ll be taking 3 1st rounders imo

 

[citizen-erased]

I would be surprised if their preference isn't to take 2 top 10s and trade the other with pies for 16 and their future 1st and then take the 2 academy kids.

i think we'll have an additional senior spot still
Could be DFA/MSD spot.
Or we grab a late pick if Brand bid doesnt come in before 44.

or we use 44 & F3's we have to move up

 

[SherbertLemon]

Why on earth would Collingwood part with 14 and their future first for one of our firsts? That sounds like a terrible waste of picks. Especially in a year where the draft is more speculative than usual.

 

[Steve94]

Why on earth would Collingwood part with 14 and their future first for one of our firsts? That sounds like a terrible waste of picks. Especially in a year where the draft is more speculative than usual.

Their first round pick next year gets eaten up by the Daicos bid so they don't have a great need for it and can instead move up ahead of their McInnes bid this year

 

[Dons4Life]

i think we'll have an additional senior spot still
Could be DFA/MSD spot.
Or we grab a late pick if Brand bid doesnt come in before 44.

or we use 44 & F3's we have to move up

I think with the amount of picks that will get sucked up from bids on rival players (JUH, Campbell, Jones, McInnes etc) our late picks will be plenty to cover Brand and Eyre. Perhaps 44 or one of the future 3rds get used in getting the pies to deal with us. I definitely think keeping a spot free for the mid season draft is a great option with some of the Vic kids who slip through and dont get picked up due to no exposure in their senior year.

 

[eth-dog]

I think with the amount of picks that will get sucked up from bids on rival players (JUH, Campbell, Jones, McInnes etc) our late picks will be plenty to cover Brand and Eyre. Perhaps 44 or one of the future 3rds get used in getting the pies to deal with us. I definitely think keeping a spot free for the mid season draft is a great option with some of the Vic kids who slip through and dont get picked up due to no exposure in their senior year.

If we elect to not replace Mozzie in the SSP we'll have a MSD pick. However I suspect we'll be signing Kyle Dunkley

48

Kyle Dunkley

Age

25

Ht

185cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

9.6

2star

K

6.8

3star

HB

2.8

2star

M

4.4

4star

T

2.0

4star

CL

0.6

3star

No current season stats available

D

9.6

3star

K

6.8

3star

HB

2.8

3star

M

4.4

4star

T

2.0

4star

CL

0.6

3star

that way

 

[Dons4Life]

If we elect to not replace Mozzie in the SSP we'll have a MSD pick. However I suspect we'll be signing Kyle Dunkley

48

Kyle Dunkley

Age

25

Ht

185cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

9.6

2star

K

6.8

3star

HB

2.8

2star

M

4.4

4star

T

2.0

4star

CL

0.6

3star

No current season stats available

D

9.6

3star

K

6.8

3star

HB

2.8

3star

M

4.4

4star

T

2.0

4star

CL

0.6

3star

that way

I think if Mozzie goes on the LTI we will have 32 contracted, 3 Cat A rooks (Clarke, Gleeson, McQuillan) and 2 Cat B rooks (Hird, McBride).
That means we can either add 5 senior list spots and 2 Cat A rookies or 6 senior list and 1 Cat A rookie. Definitely wont be surprised if Dunkley is added to Rookie list. So maybe we take 5 picks, add Dunkley and keep 1 spot free.

 

[Red Black and Blue]

Their first round pick next year gets eaten up by the Daicos bid so they don't have a great need for it and can instead move up ahead of their McInnes bid this year

I hope they still feel this way. Massive chance they have a top 5 pick.

 

[eth-dog]

I think if Mozzie goes on the LTI we will have 32 contracted, 3 Cat A rooks (Clarke, Gleeson, McQuillan) and 2 Cat B rooks (Hird, McBride).
That means we can either add 5 senior list spots and 2 Cat A rookies or 6 senior list and 1 Cat A rookie. Definitely wont be surprised if Dunkley is added to Rookie list. So maybe we take 5 picks, add Dunkley and keep 1 spot free.

Okay, assuming that Mozzie and Stewart are signed on, we'll have 32 senior, 4 Cat A (you forgot Snelling) and 2 Cat B.

 

[Dons4Life]

Okay, assuming that Mozzie and Stewart are signed on, we'll have 32 senior, 4 Cat A (you forgot Snelling) and 2 Cat B.

I had included Snelling in the 32 but had Mosquito on the LTI so didn't include him in the numbers. Not sure on the timeframe on when a club can transfer someone from the primary list to LTI.

 

[eth-dog]

I had included Snelling in the 32 but had Mosquito on the LTI so didn't include him in the numbers. Not sure on the timeframe on when a club can transfer someone from the primary list to LTI.

Snelling is a Category A rookie for 1 more year. You can put a player on the LTI at any point in time, you just have to have him there a minimum of 8 weeks

 

[Dons4Life]

Okay, assuming that Mozzie and Stewart are signed on, we'll have 32 senior, 4 Cat A (you forgot Snelling) and 2 Cat B.

So if Moz is on the primary list and Snelling is Cat A we can take 5 and 1 rookie, or 6 and no rookies and then potentiall replace Moz down the track?

 

[eth-dog]

So if Moz is on the primary list and Snelling is Cat A we can take 5 and 1 rookie, or 6 and no rookies and then potentiall replace Moz down the track?

We can take 4/2, 5/1 or 6/0.

 

[Lore]

Snelling is a Category A rookie for 1 more year. You can put a player on the LTI at any point in time, you just have to have him there a minimum of 8 weeks

Inactive list ≠ LTI list though. I don't think they do the LTI list anymore except to upgrade Cat B rookies.

Inactive list rules them out for the season so that they can be replaced by drafting another rookie, and they can't be moved back to the senior list unless someone replaces them on the inactive list (so the rookie has security with that 6 month contract or whatever).

Not sure if you can put them on that list before the draft and whether it affects senior list numbers for the purposes of list lodgements, but it seems not or we wouldn't have needed to rookie both Clarke and Gleeson (both of whom have contracts that we probably now have to pay out).

Another aspect of the AFL that isn't present in the published rules! Hopefully the revised CBA includes some of this stuff.

 

[Dons4Life]

Yeah true for some reason thought it was minimum 37 on main list but yeah 36 so could have plenty of options which way they want to go

 

[Red Black and Blue]

Fair enough but Day was always around the top 10-15, Fair chance Rioli goes in the rookie draft.

FWIW I'd trade Anderson, Serong or Green for Day.

Green for sure but dont count him cause he was academy reserved. Not Anderson, I thought he under performed from my expectations. Serong was great too but don’t see the upside from here. You’d be happy if he produced this level for the rest of his career though. Day though blew me away, strength beyond his size, amazing aerially at times, impacted games all over. Hell of pick that a lot thought was a reach.

 

[SherbertLemon]

Their first round pick next year gets eaten up by the Daicos bid so they don't have a great need for it and can instead move up ahead of their McInnes bid this year

Ah, I see, thanks.

I can’t keep up with our academy/FS let alone others.