eth-dog
Tier 1 WW Player
Who's the next David Zaharakis? Let's draft him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Hopefully. I thought we'd get one for Lav but apparently Cat B rookies don't count.Mutch has been placed on the LTI, does this mean we have a pick in the mid season draft now?
Hopefully for my sakeMutch has been placed on the LTI, does this mean we have a pick in the mid season draft now?
We currently have 28 players who will be 25 or under at the end of the year. If we arrange them into a 22 plus extras:What do people think our number one position required for this draft is? Think it’ll be more divisive than previous years as we look pretty balanced.
I want a quick wingman able to hit the scoreboardWhat do people think our number one position required for this draft is? Think it’ll be more divisive than previous years as we look pretty balanced.
HamI want a quick wingman able to hit the scoreboard
I want more Ham it seems
With Draper out, will we be able to recruit someone for our rookie list in the draft? I’m guessing not.Do we have any MSD picks and if so how many?
We get 1 pick now that draper is done for the yearDo we have any MSD picks and if so how many?
One with Draper's absence. I thought we'd be able to have 2 since Mutch was a LTIDo we have any MSD picks and if so how many?
With Draper out, will we be able to recruit someone for our rookie list in the draft? I’m guessing not.
We get 1 pick now that draper is done for the year
One with Draper's absence. I thought we'd be able to have 2 since Mutch was a LTI
LTI isn't enough - you need to denote a player 'inactive' and thereby ineligible for the whole season, where LTI is only 8 weeks minimum. LTI is nearly defunct now though given Cat A rookies no longer need elevating.One with Draper's absence. I thought we'd be able to have 2 since Mutch was a LTI
It's one as explained in the post below yours apparently
So somewhere between 0 and 2.
Glad we’re all on the same page!!
It's for the Cat B though. Imagine if we had a Mark Blicavs and we decided not to demote someone straight after they had a 10 week injury?LTI isn't enough - you need to denote a player 'inactive' and thereby ineligible for the whole season, where LTI is only 8 weeks minimum. LTI is nearly defunct now though given Cat A rookies no longer need elevating.
Guelfi did that in WAFL.I want a quick wingman able to hit the scoreboard