- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Posts
- 46,750
- Reaction score
- 89,974
- Location
- 3121
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Who F****** Cares
i have no problem with taking gorringe, because from all reports he is just as likely to become a gun chf as he is a ruckman & the same goes for vickery ff
the way the game is going specially with the interchange limitations , i dont think any team will go into games with 2 ruckman that cant fill other needs
as collingwood has shown this year going for brown ahead of wood & fraser could be the way of the future & the unpredictability guys like gorringe & vickery will provide along with even griffiths who is also ruck height.
gorringe,vickery,griffiths along with browne (i have huge expectations on this kid) could all be part of our ruck/foward structure for many years to come.
the first 3 along with jack rotate through our foward structure & help out browne in the ruck.................... which means graham will be surplus to our needs & trade bait in 1-2 years but which time browne,vickery would of passed him by.
the way the game is going specially with the interchange limitations , i dont think any team will go into games with 2 ruckman that cant fill other needs
as collingwood has shown this year going for brown ahead of wood & fraser could be the way of the future & the unpredictability guys like gorringe & vickery will provide along with even griffiths who is also ruck height.
gorringe,vickery,griffiths along with browne (i have huge expectations on this kid) could all be part of our ruck/foward structure for many years to come.
the first 3 along with jack rotate through our foward structure & help out browne in the ruck.................... which means graham will be surplus to our needs & trade bait in 1-2 years but which time browne,vickery would of passed him by.




