Dream Team 2007 sucks

Teh_Nub

All Australian
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Posts
965
Likes
0
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
#26
Shouldnt be to much hard work, should it?
Basically copying one and duplicating it just change the salary cap?
Shouldnt have to rewrite it or whateva. Just make them on seperate servers and have 2 different links.

I think they have multiple servers for DT already dont they? eg http://afl7.virtualsports.com.au with the bold number changing
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dime

Club Legend
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Posts
1,132
Likes
4
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
LAL, KC Chiefs
#27
I think it's a good idea.
I also think the AFL don't give a stuff about us. Shame, really.

But yeh it really wouldn't be too hard. All they have to change is the original salary cap. Pity there's no way the AFL would listen to average DT nut.
 

SJ

Moderator
Joined
May 22, 2006
Posts
33,037
Likes
15,927
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Moderator #28
it clearly does,
so many injuries and early form slumps,
nearly all geelong players scoring well (steve johnson wtf???)
finishing top and out in straight sets
too much money at the start taking out all of the skill invloved

anyone agree?
He's a certainty for All Australian, after playing only fifteen games. What's your problem?
 
Joined
May 2, 2007
Posts
46
Likes
7
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
#29
This is the exact reason why Supercoach is BETTER then Dreamteam. If you were a so-called football enthusiast, then I can't see why you'd ever choose Dreamteam over Supercoach...

In reality, the best SC side would kill the best DT side because it'd consist of (1) Key-position players (2) Effective players. Besides, I doubt there'd be many top-ranked novices who got there with luck.
 

Rough_Edges

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 7, 2003
Posts
19,645
Likes
5,729
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Swansea, Wizards
#31
This is the exact reason why Supercoach is BETTER then Dreamteam. If you were a so-called football enthusiast, then I can't see why you'd ever choose Dreamteam over Supercoach...

In reality, the best SC side would kill the best DT side because it'd consist of (1) Key-position players (2) Effective players. Besides, I doubt there'd be many top-ranked novices who got there with luck.
lol Supercoach is fixed anyway.

it is shithouse.

I am 44th and it's boring.
 

warnie

All Australian
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Posts
774
Likes
67
Location
DT Talk
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Warne Dawgs (DT)
#32
this sounds like the converstaions at the DT TALK house.. like the whole luck factor (especially in finals!!) where Chop and Roy (two highest ranked coaches in our league) got knocked out in the first week of the finals... which sucks cos ours is worth $200 for the winner and $120 for runner up.. (I'm not complaining as I am all but in the GF ;))

but - there are smiles now that there is the finals DT haha.. if ur keen to join our DT TALK league, get into it at http://aflfinals.virtualsports.com.au with the league code of: 648912
 

banana_bus

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Posts
8,451
Likes
2,317
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
#33
This is the exact reason why Supercoach is BETTER then Dreamteam. If you were a so-called football enthusiast, then I can't see why you'd ever choose Dreamteam over Supercoach...

In reality, the best SC side would kill the best DT side because it'd consist of (1) Key-position players (2) Effective players. Besides, I doubt there'd be many top-ranked novices who got there with luck.
I didnt look at my side for the first half of the season and now im in like the top 200, with a team that is shit.

Dont tell me SC is better it is shithouse.
 

Teh_Nub

All Australian
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Posts
965
Likes
0
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
#34
This is the exact reason why Supercoach is BETTER then Dreamteam. If you were a so-called football enthusiast, then I can't see why you'd ever choose Dreamteam over Supercoach...

In reality, the best SC side would kill the best DT side because it'd consist of (1) Key-position players (2) Effective players. Besides, I doubt there'd be many top-ranked novices who got there with luck.
Dreamteam is simple and an easier game to play, its a game if SC was better then DT more people would play SC you have your own opinion like everyone else unfortunately ur in the minority.
 

Budgie63

Senior List
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Posts
258
Likes
9
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
St Kilda
#35
Dreamteam is simple and an easier game to play, its a game if SC was better then DT more people would play SC you have your own opinion like everyone else unfortunately ur in the minority.
I don't think that's it. I think that the reason more people DT than SC is that more are aware of it. I'd guess that more average AFL followers read afl.com.au than the HS site.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

chickens_law

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Posts
5,368
Likes
4
Location
Igloo
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Hull City
#37
This is the exact reason why Supercoach is BETTER then Dreamteam. If you were a so-called football enthusiast, then I can't see why you'd ever choose Dreamteam over Supercoach...

In reality, the best SC side would kill the best DT side because it'd consist of (1) Key-position players (2) Effective players. Besides, I doubt there'd be many top-ranked novices who got there with luck.
I agree. Many here are moaning about DT being too easy and SC being too complex.

Mostly its just luck.
 
Top Bottom