I don't get the double standard, it's being glossed over but 19 people were hospitalised. Some will spend months recovering. And the cause seems just as dangerous as ever. At dreamworld if the dangerous ride was closed a very high possibility the risk was removed completely and the place could have kept running like the festival seems to be doing
Is the fact deaths occurred more important to PR than the ongoing risk factor?
Is the fact deaths occurred more important to PR than the ongoing risk factor?
Last edited: