Drugs in sport - Where we've been, where we are at.

Remove this Banner Ad

blackcat

Irving's godfather and handle
Dec 29, 2003
28,431
14,168
Beverly Hills 90210 Antifa bracket
AFL Club
Richmond
this comes via Sniper at cyclingnewsforum
______________________________________________________

Some fragments from an article on drug use in British sport from the 1960s onwards.
Reference:
Waddington, Ivan. 2005. "Changing Patterns of Drug Use in British Sport from the 1960s". In: Sport in History Volume 25, Issue 3, 472-496.

[quote article now....]In December 1987, The Times newspaper published a three-part investigation into doping in British sport.
...
The Times characterized the history of drug taking among British
athletes during the previous fifteen years as involving three processes: ‘the
spread from the throwing events to all the track and field disciplines; the
spread from international down towards club level and the involvement of
youngsters; and official connivance to cheat the testing system’.
...
'In the 1980s, with increasingly sophisticated
products, the athlete using drugs is as likely to be a long jumper as a
hammer-thrower and even the once sacrosanct middle- and long-distance
events are not immune’
...
Among the athletes with whom The Times spoke was Dave Abrahams, a former United Kingdom indoor record-holder in the high jump. Abrahams described the journey home following the 1982 Common-
wealth Games in Brisbane, Australia: ‘On the plane back, most of the
English team were talking about drugs. I’d say 80 per cent of them were,
or had been on them.’ John Docherty, a former Scottish international 400-
metre hurdler who at the time lived in the south of England, said that
drug taking was already spreading down from the elite level to Southern
League athletics
...
It is clear that, by this time, there was already developing in at least
some sports within Britain a culture that was shared by some athletes and
coaches and which involved not only an acceptance of doping but also a
significant degree of organization to obtain drugs and avoid detection.
[Peter] Coni described overseas training camps involving British athletes in which
athletes ‘sat down with their coach to work through the coming
competitive season, dividing up between them the events at which testing
might occur so that each would have ‘‘come off ’’ drugs for only the
minimum period to evade the risk of detection if called for testing’.
Clearly there was already a substantial demand for, and use of,
performance-enhancing drugs by British athletes; a particularly striking
revelation by Coni related to a training camp in Portugal in the early
1980s at which the local chemists’ shops ‘ran out of anabolic steroids because of the purchases by British athletes’ [/quote]

And it goes on like that. Very interesting reading. Makes a complete mockery of the idea of clean (British) top sport. I might post up some more later.
[ /quote]

but eh, as Lance Uppercut tells us, affal athletes alliterationz r a breed apart and have axiomatically a different ethic craigsaundersbohdanbabijczukbuttifanttonydohertygazelledankchartersplural are not the evil ones, albert is not evil, shane woewodin is not evil thanking charter on his brownlow victory, correction, charters plural, but woewodin was pretty stupid thanking him, and bulldogs fmr ceo simon garlick, and darce and scott west. it is how the sausage is made folks, and Durian rider may even be correct, certainly more correct than the ignorance that prevails, and obviously i was not seriously using lance as the example, inverting his voice...

and all those trainers and scientists and doctors prolly very professional and have an expertise and protect an athlete from topping themself with PEDs. thats the line the cycling MDs say, and I see a validity in that.

p'raps RussellEbertHandball and b0ydman can provide some examples from Wermer Reiterer's PosiT!ve tomb[sic] but the tome aint that thick to be a tome. too thin, needed more roids.
the book that was banned, yeah, i used licence
6.jpeg


too much weights not enuf speed work brah
 
Last edited:
this comes via Sniper at cyclingnewsforum
______________________________________________________

Some fragments from an article on drug use in British sport from the 1960s onwards.
Reference:
Waddington, Ivan. 2005. "Changing Patterns of Drug Use in British Sport from the 1960s". In: Sport in History Volume 25, Issue 3, 472-496.

[quote article now....]In December 1987, The Times newspaper published a three-part investigation into doping in British sport.
...
The Times characterized the history of drug taking among British
athletes during the previous fifteen years as involving three processes: ‘the
spread from the throwing events to all the track and field disciplines; the
spread from international down towards club level and the involvement of
youngsters; and official connivance to cheat the testing system’.
...
'In the 1980s, with increasingly sophisticated
products, the athlete using drugs is as likely to be a long jumper as a
hammer-thrower and even the once sacrosanct middle- and long-distance
events are not immune’
...
Among the athletes with whom The Times spoke was Dave Abrahams, a former United Kingdom indoor record-holder in the high jump. Abrahams described the journey home following the 1982 Common-
wealth Games in Brisbane, Australia: ‘On the plane back, most of the
English team were talking about drugs. I’d say 80 per cent of them were,
or had been on them.’ John Docherty, a former Scottish international 400-
metre hurdler who at the time lived in the south of England, said that
drug taking was already spreading down from the elite level to Southern
League athletics
...
It is clear that, by this time, there was already developing in at least
some sports within Britain a culture that was shared by some athletes and
coaches and which involved not only an acceptance of doping but also a
significant degree of organization to obtain drugs and avoid detection.
[Peter] Coni described overseas training camps involving British athletes in which
athletes ‘sat down with their coach to work through the coming
competitive season, dividing up between them the events at which testing
might occur so that each would have ‘‘come off ’’ drugs for only the
minimum period to evade the risk of detection if called for testing’.
Clearly there was already a substantial demand for, and use of,
performance-enhancing drugs by British athletes; a particularly striking
revelation by Coni related to a training camp in Portugal in the early
1980s at which the local chemists’ shops ‘ran out of anabolic steroids because of the purchases by British athletes’

I think one of the current Russian athletes has pointed the finger at the British, for state-sanctioned doping:

"In another development, Pole vaulter Yelena Isinbayeva has accused United States, Germany, Kenya, and Britain of “systematic doping”. Isinbayeva, an influential figure who is seeking to be elected onto the IOC Athletes’ Commission, remarked other countries have just as bad anti-doping records as Russia. Isinbayeva, who was Mayor of the Athletes’ Village during the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics, is placing her hopes on getting elected onto the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Athletes’ Commission in August.

Isinbayeva remarked we know that in other countries, such as USA, UK, Germany, Kenya, athletes were disqualified and added they quietly sat out two years, not stopping exercise, and then came back to win, and set records. The pole vaulter added the alleged inconsistency is “quite incomprehensible” and “unfair”.

Isinbayeva said she will sue for a violation of her human rights if she is not allowed to compete. The two-time Olympic champion said she is not responsible for other people’s actions and she has never broken the rules."
 
I think one of the current Russian athletes has pointed the finger at the British, for state-sanctioned doping:

"In another development, Pole vaulter Yelena Isinbayeva has accused United States, Germany, Kenya, and Britain of “systematic doping”. Isinbayeva, an influential figure who is seeking to be elected onto the IOC Athletes’ Commission, remarked other countries have just as bad anti-doping records as Russia. Isinbayeva, who was Mayor of the Athletes’ Village during the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics, is placing her hopes on getting elected onto the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Athletes’ Commission in August.

Isinbayeva remarked we know that in other countries, such as USA, UK, Germany, Kenya, athletes were disqualified and added they quietly sat out two years, not stopping exercise, and then came back to win, and set records. The pole vaulter added the alleged inconsistency is “quite incomprehensible” and “unfair”.

Isinbayeva said she will sue for a violation of her human rights if she is not allowed to compete. The two-time Olympic champion said she is not responsible for other people’s actions and she has never broken the rules."

quite a fan of Isinbayeva, but it is a joke that anyone lining up in the olympic finals in T&F events, is on the colloquial bread and water. ALL ON HORMONES

evo how sexy is that pose? better than a bbq thats for shur
upload_2016-6-1_23-48-29.jpeg
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The Meldonium operation was a good one by WADA. We deride them for their incompetency as an anti-doping governing body, but in their actual role as a geopolitical tool used to cover up doping among Western athletes and attack its adversaries, they have performed admirably recently.

They quietly added an ineffective drug primarily used in the former Soviet Union that stays in the system for ages to the banned list, did it after the Russian doping agency had already been suspended so as to ensure the majority of athletes were oblivious to its inclusion anyway and then used the set up to claim evidence of systematic doping.
 
The Meldonium operation was a good one by WADA. We deride them for their incompetency as an anti-doping governing body, but in their actual role as a geopolitical tool used to cover up doping among Western athletes and attack its adversaries, they have performed admirably recently.

They quietly added an ineffective drug primarily used in the former Soviet Union that stays in the system for ages to the banned list, did it after the Russian doping agency had already been suspended so as to ensure the majority of athletes were oblivious to its inclusion anyway and then used the set up to claim evidence of systematic doping.
Sports NATO
like Sharknando, but for sports :D upload_2016-6-2_15-10-46.jpeg


say it really quick three timez, the phonetics sound the same, well, if you say "sports"instead of shark
 
The Meldonium operation was a good one by WADA. We deride them for their incompetency as an anti-doping governing body, but in their actual role as a geopolitical tool used to cover up doping among Western athletes and attack its adversaries, they have performed admirably recently.

They quietly added an ineffective drug primarily used in the former Soviet Union that stays in the system for ages to the banned list, did it after the Russian doping agency had already been suspended so as to ensure the majority of athletes were oblivious to its inclusion anyway and then used the set up to claim evidence of systematic doping.
well said, plus 2
 
I'll stick this in here as its generic I reckon, but the Fuentes Blood Bag destruction decision still hasn't been handed down despite the courts case finishing up in last year. I think time for some prosecutions run out at the end of June. That might be a driver as to why no ruling has ben handed down I read in one article.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/13/operation-puerto-continues-to-shed-bad-light-on-sp/
By TALES AZZONI - Associated Press - Friday, May 13, 2016
MADRID (AP) - Ten years later, one of the worst doping scandals in Spain continues to haunt the country’s athletes.

Operation Puerto, the 2006 investigation which unveiled a doping network involving some of the world’s top cyclists, refuses to go away as a local court drags on deciding whether hundreds of confiscated blood bags should be destroyed. The announcement about the fate of the blood bags, which could stir up another scandal if identities of new athletes are revealed, was expected last year, but it has been constantly delayed over the last few months, upsetting some Spanish athletes and local sports officials who say the lack of closure on the case has further damaged the country’s image in the fight against doping.
.....
Spain’s top sports official said the government has done its part by asking for the blood bags to be released, but noted that the court’s decision must be respected. Miguel Cardenal, president of the country’s Higher Sports Council, said Spain has made significant progress in the fight against doping despite the setbacks with Operation Puerto and the non-compliance ruling by WADA.

“I think that for the last few years the public perception is that Spain does not tolerate doping,” Cardenal said. “Operation Puerto happened several years ago, the same result would have probably happened in other places because at the time countries did not specify doping as a crime as they do now.”

Operation Puerto came to light when police seized coded blood bags from the Madrid clinic of sports doctor Eufemiano Fuentes, who worked with several top cyclists. In a trial in 2013, he was convicted of endangering public health and received a suspended one-year prison sentence for improperly performing blood transfusions on athletes.
......
The Madrid court handling the case had said a ruling was reached late last year and a decision would be made public by the end of March. But since then there has been no new timetable on when the much-anticipated decision will be announced. The court said that it takes time because the case has a complex appeals process with several parties involved.......
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/13/operation-puerto-continues-to-shed-bad-light-on-sp/
 
Last edited:
u forgot mattbarber dude

Are you talking about the guy who claimed to be the strength and conditioning coach for Subiaco and also had ears and eyes for talent across Australia and was willing to welcome young lads to stay in his abode while they were there to attend a third round, miracle job interview with a well known law firm for a kid who had no experience?

The same guy who needed human growth hormone for his failing heart?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Are you talking about the guy who claimed to be the strength and conditioning coach for Subiaco and also had ears and eyes for talent across Australia and was willing to welcome young lads to stay in his abode while they were there to attend a third round, miracle job interview with a well known law firm for a kid who had no experience?

The same guy who needed human growth hormone for his failing heart?
dean capabianco's coach too
he posted on the FigBooty a while back, just googles the Matt Barber site:figbooty.com/forum
 
I'll stick this in here as its generic I reckon, but the Fuentes Blood Bag destruction decision still hasn't been handed down despite the courts case finishing up in last year. I think time for some prosecutions run out at the end of June. That might be a driver as to why no ruling has ben handed down I read in one article.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/13/operation-puerto-continues-to-shed-bad-light-on-sp/
By TALES AZZONI - Associated Press - Friday, May 13, 2016
MADRID (AP) - Ten years later, one of the worst doping scandals in Spain continues to haunt the country’s athletes.

Operation Puerto, the 2006 investigation which unveiled a doping network involving some of the world’s top cyclists, refuses to go away as a local court drags on deciding whether hundreds of confiscated blood bags should be destroyed. The announcement about the fate of the blood bags, which could stir up another scandal if identities of new athletes are revealed, was expected last year, but it has been constantly delayed over the last few months, upsetting some Spanish athletes and local sports officials who say the lack of closure on the case has further damaged the country’s image in the fight against doping.
.....
Spain’s top sports official said the government has done its part by asking for the blood bags to be released, but noted that the court’s decision must be respected. Miguel Cardenal, president of the country’s Higher Sports Council, said Spain has made significant progress in the fight against doping despite the setbacks with Operation Puerto and the non-compliance ruling by WADA.

“I think that for the last few years the public perception is that Spain does not tolerate doping,” Cardenal said. “Operation Puerto happened several years ago, the same result would have probably happened in other places because at the time countries did not specify doping as a crime as they do now.”

Operation Puerto came to light when police seized coded blood bags from the Madrid clinic of sports doctor Eufemiano Fuentes, who worked with several top cyclists. In a trial in 2013, he was convicted of endangering public health and received a suspended one-year prison sentence for improperly performing blood transfusions on athletes.
......
The Madrid court handling the case had said a ruling was reached late last year and a decision would be made public by the end of March. But since then there has been no new timetable on when the much-anticipated decision will be announced. The court said that it takes time because the case has a complex appeals process with several parties involved.......
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/13/operation-puerto-continues-to-shed-bad-light-on-sp/
Progress apparently ....

https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/n...ecision-to-provide-access-to-operation-puerto

WADA Acknowledges Madrid Court Decision to provide Access to "Operation Puerto" Athlete Blood Bags

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is pleased with the decision taken by the Madrid Court of Appeal to provide access to stored Operation Puerto blood and plasma bags of athletes from cycling and other sports.

“WADA acknowledges the Madrid Court of Appeal for having reached the decision to provide anti-doping authorities with this crucial evidence,” said WADA Director General, David Howman. “We are dismayed that it took so long to receive the decision but we will now partner with the other parties that have been granted access [to the blood bags], to determine our legal options vis-à-vis analysing the blood and plasma bags.”

Operation Puerto is a Spanish Police investigation into a doping ring led by Dr. Eufemiano Fuentes. In 2006, 211 blood and plasma bags were seized from the offices of Dr. Fuentes who was then handed a one-year suspended sentence for endangering public health. The investigation also resulted in anti-doping rule violations for five cyclists; and, led to suspicion of numerous as yet unnamed athletes from other sports that had been treated by Dr. Fuentes. For years, WADA asked Spanish authorities to provide the Agency and partner anti-doping organisations with access to the blood and plasma bags so that any anti-doping rule violations could be pursued. In April 2013, the Criminal Court of Madrid ordered the destruction of the blood and plasma bags -- a decision that WADA appealed in May 2013.

WADA will make no further comment at this time.
 
anti-doping moralists have fabricated notions of a pristine pre–drug era that their missionary efforts would resurrect. And to create a sense of fear to justify the sometimes human-rights-violating intrusions of an anti-doping infrastructure, anti-doping crusaders, with the help of the media, made up tales about the mortal dangers of drugs that were often out of proportion to their actual, clinically documented lethality
 
61_99 and the succour moms
the story of European cyclists dying en masse in the 1990s from EPO is a myth—a fabrication that neither the press nor anti-doping campaigners examined for truth. Admitting that no evidence existed conclusively linking EPO to a supposed rash of endurance athlete deaths would expose as fraud a story that in many respects justified the existence of anti-doping regulators and sensation-hungry reporters.

#succourmoms
#J61_99
jenny61_99
 
The stigmatization of doping in sports—after nearly 100 years during which the act was unremarkably accepted, even praised, as a sign of professional commitment—is a natural progression of human events. By understanding these transformations, and the hypocrisies they hide, we can gain better insight into where anti-doping is today
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top