Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
From what I can gather, a lot of the top sides are already beginning to struggle now through a perceived lack of trades (And furthermore, cover). Yes, those trades you have suggested would gain you some sort of points advantage, but have you considered a less aggressive approach, which may net you more points?
7 Trades left is a good position to be in at this stage, particularly with that rank. As far as sides above you, I would hazard a guess that about 80% of them would have between 4-6 trades left. Now, i'm not sure you share a similar belief, but I am under the impression that we will be seeing a lot of 'General Soreness' on Team Sheets come Rounds 16-22. If you use your trades wisely, by either covering zeroes or picking players that will theoretically guarantee you in excess of 80+ points a week (Do durable players even exist these days?), you could wipe out that assumed 150-250 points (That you would make from the Ball/Ziebell trades) in the space of a couple of weeks.
Obviously this is a conservative approach in contrast, and a situation which you won't have control over, but it has the potential to reep huge benefits.
Just some food for thought.
Option 6: McGuire to stirjk, matrin to swan.
If I were you I'd sit on 7 trades by waiting for some good downgrade option for fyfe. If a good fwd target does come along you could do hall to chapman/SJ & nason to carrazzo quite comfortably. IMO its about minimising trades.
If you think its not worth the risk then just do the nason trade. But IMO webberly has just as much JS as TDL so either or.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Your rucks are clearly an issue. Only 1 of them played last week and he scored 5 and copped an LTI. There is a possibility that you will have none of your rucks playing this week at all, so I'd be focusing there.Hey guys, i know its early in the week. But being overseas i dont have access to the internet as often as id like, so i thought id post the side up ( just going for my league ) and see what you guys think, then hopefully later in the week il have a few more options in mind then what i currently have, then i can make a decision.
Heres the side...
cheers
Why would you not make the change this week? Do you already have decent cover?
Hey guys, i know its early in the week. But being overseas i dont have access to the internet as often as id like, so i thought id post the side up ( just going for my league ) and see what you guys think, then hopefully later in the week il have a few more options in mind then what i currently have, then i can make a decision.
Heres the side...
cheers
Hey guys,
I have 7 trades left and this is my team -
Not sure what trades if any I should make.
Thanks.
Since then I haven't been watching any rucks so would like to see them in a game. Price doesn't worry me as long as someone is under 350,000 I can afford them.
Hey guys, i know its early in the week. But being overseas i dont have access to the internet as often as id like, so i thought id post the side up ( just going for my league ) and see what you guys think, then hopefully later in the week il have a few more options in mind then what i currently have, then i can make a decision.
Heres the side...
cheers
I would downgrade Tippett to a 77/94k player, giving you about 180-160k. Use that to upgrade Kreuzer to either Cox or Sandilands. Hille will be back this week so your rucks are fine.
Next week I would look to downgrade Armstrong to a 77/94k player, giving you about 180-160k again. Use that to upgrade Silvagni to a premium defender.
I would have thought the purpose of having a DP mid/forward 77k non playing rookie would be to utilise the mid/forward dual positional link. Problem is you do not have any DP mid/forwards in your midfield to utilise the feature. If you had him in your midfield you could move Pav, ROK, Didak, Ziebell to the midfield at anytime to cover possible injuries, as you aren't going to get much cover from Shuey who apparantly has passed away. Vale. and Armstrong's JS isn't that great. 
It's a good point you make, towards the end of year when trades get tight people get forced into doing things they don't like, keeping the 0 or not making that final upgrade etc.From what I can gather, a lot of the top sides are already beginning to struggle now through a perceived lack of trades (And furthermore, cover). Yes, those trades you have suggested would gain you some sort of points advantage, but have you considered a less aggressive approach, which may net you more points?
7 Trades left is a good position to be in at this stage, particularly with that rank. As far as sides above you, I would hazard a guess that about 80% of them would have between 4-6 trades left. Now, i'm not sure you share a similar belief, but I am under the impression that we will be seeing a lot of 'General Soreness' on Team Sheets come Rounds 16-22. If you use your trades wisely, by either covering zeroes or picking players that will theoretically guarantee you in excess of 80+ points a week (Do durable players even exist these days?
Obviously this is a conservative approach in contrast, and a situation which you won't have control over, but it has the potential to reep huge benefits.
Just some food for thought.
