There's no need to be condescending, just because your argument cannot be sustained. There is no evidence. Hence the unequivocal statement that no criminal activity occurred. Why do some people have so much trouble comprehending that maybe, just maybe, such a statement is exactly what is means, that no crime occurred ?
Or maybe, there was no crime. Sometimes it can be as simple as that. Just because she is a woman doesn't mean that she is beyond embellishing her side of the story
as you say, no evidence no charge. The police reviewed the footage, they spoke to witnesses and found that nothing criminal occurred, the allegations that she was all to ready to make via the media could not be sustained when properly investigated.
I think we all know how statements are recorded. Again, there is no need to be condescending just because you cannot sustain your argument.
Again, even though she chose not to make a statement, it dose not follow that the police will not pursue charges, if they believe an offense occurred. And believe me, under the current political environment regarding domestic violence, the police would have gone in hard if they believe a threat actually did occur. Statement or no statement. After all even PM Turnbull has made DV priority number 1. Unfortunately, for the alleged "victim", she chose to tell her story to sections of the Media and for whatever reason has chosen not to make a statement to the Police. That's not a good look at all. Excuses, such as her not wanting to be identified (she wouldn't be under normal court protocol) don't wash. It only makes her look as if she has something to hide