Opinion Dustin Martin is better than Dangerfield

Remove this Banner Ad

We are 6 years old though. In terms if $$, corruption, facilities.

And even at 6 years old we went 10 rounds with mike tyson at 25yo and stayed the distance. Respect that more than a 25yo mike tyson bashing a 12yo girl with crohns disease.
You're still going kid? St Kilda would get knocked out in the first round
 
We are 6 years old though. In terms if $$, corruption, facilities.

And even at 6 years old we went 10 rounds with mike tyson at 25yo and stayed the distance. Respect that more than a 25yo mike tyson bashing a 12yo girl with crohns disease.

How many of you are in there?
 
You're still going kid? St Kilda would get knocked out in the first round
since afl began saints have beaten richmond more often than not. We the saints have literally beaten you guys more out of all the games weve played.
So stfu

Saints v Richmond AFL record
played 45
Saints 24
Richmond 20
Drawn 1

:)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

meanwhile, back on topic.
Bottom line is whether the respective supporters of each club would swap their player for the other?
As a Tigers man, no way on this earth would I swap Dusty for Danger! Dusty to me is a complete weapon, both mid and forward, is an elite user and match winner. Danger has great traits too, but his kicking is at best, pretty average. Just not as polished imo
 
meanwhile, back on topic.
Bottom line is whether the respective supporters of each club would swap their player for the other?
As a Tigers man, no way on this earth would I swap Dusty for Danger! Dusty to me is a complete weapon, both mid and forward, is an elite user and match winner. Danger has great traits too, but his kicking is at best, pretty average. Just not as polished imo
The bottom line is really who cares now? The point has been driven home. How many different ways can Richmond supporters like you articulate that Dusty is better? Nobody is arguing against Dusty being the better footballer
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We have 2 minor flags which is the real flag. You have 0 because you were never the best team of the year.
You won because you played tired/wrecked interstate teams at home ground. AND fyi tiger "people" threatened the other teams familys. absolute corrupt flags. so proud you must be
 
Wow Dusty/Serena baby boy

hahahah

LeDusty

We have 2 minor flags which is the real flag. You have 0 because you were never the best team of the year.
You won because you played tired/wrecked interstate teams at home ground. AND fyi tiger "people" threatened the other teams familys. absolute corrupt flags. so proud you must be

Richmond won the minor premiership last year dopey
 
We have 2 minor flags which is the real flag. You have 0 because you were never the best team of the year.
You won because you played tired/wrecked interstate teams at home ground. AND fyi tiger "people" threatened the other teams familys. absolute corrupt flags. so proud you must be
Would rather two major flags than two minor flags.
At least you have two premiership players on your list, the injury prone bloke from Sydney and the great Dan Buttler.
 
The bottom line is really who cares now? The point has been driven home. How many different ways can Richmond supporters like you articulate that Dusty is better? Nobody is arguing against Dusty being the better footballer
Another way it can be argued that Dusty is better is footy IQ. He's in the 120s, poor old Danger is in the 70s.


On SM-G955F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top