- Apr 17, 2007
- 25,023
- 43,751
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- hellas,liverpool,storm,au
The Dusty thread on the Tuggers board is a good laugh. Would read again
Summary thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Dusty thread on the Tuggers board is a good laugh. Would read again
I thinks it's sad that the only north icon they could take was one from over 30 years ago.Would've preferred mini Ben10 punching mini Bernie Vince in the guts, but Blighty will do.
He was last year. Mini Lindsay getting the games committee to change the rules again would've been good.I thinks it's sad that the only north icon they could take was one from over 30 years ago.
What about BBB you idiots?
Didn't make the cut last year thoughHe was last year. Mini Lindsay getting the games committee to change the rules again would've been good.
I was just saying the exact same thing to Charlie!I thinks it's sad that the only north icon they could take was one from over 30 years ago.
What about BBB you idiots?
A little Hansen mowing the lawn would have been gold!He was last year. Mini Lindsay getting the games committee to change the rules again would've been good.
I thinks it's sad that the only north icon they could take was one from over 30 years ago.
What about BBB you idiots?
I think that would amount to child abuse.Oh well. At least we got someone and didn't need to see the mini danger or Rance.
Just like this thread, but with the opposite point of view.Summary thanks
I've said it before, I'll say it again....
IT'S HAPPENING!!!
As much as I agree, gotta make the finals before you can win em. Let's hope for a quick bounce back up the ladder with josh and dusty in the royal blue and white!Or, if I was in his shoes, I'd want to see if you can win finals. I am not trying to take the piss. But if I was him I would be hanging out to see if the side I have been in and flopped in finals, has changed. What if he re-signs and Tigers flop again? He could count his money still I guess. But for me personally, it would be a huge factor.
He's already experienced it 3 times. You'd want to see if its going to be the same ol' same ol' or not.
Que?Don't forget Kimbo doing a bit of
View attachment 405373 View attachment 405373 View attachment 405373 View attachment 405373
Take a look at the ladder.My favourite part of the melt-a-thon was suggesting that we have an aging backline and using the examples of tarrant, thompson, and williams. Yep, 24 year old Marley williams. Not to mention Tarrant is only 5 months older than their lord and saviour Rance.
In my opinion our best back 6 would be:
Marley - Tarrant - Nielson
EVW - Thompson - Wright
Average age: 25.53 (using footywire)
Now i don't follow Richmond intimately but their back 6 last week was:
Broad - Rance - Grimes
McIntosh - Astbury - Vlastuin
Average age: 25.17 years
(Richmond supporters will probably come in kicking and screaming and say Ellis plays back or something of that nature - well if that is the case and he swaps with Vlastuin or McIntosh it will increase the average age.
Now if i include our other listed defenders:
Durdin
Mullet
JMac
Hansen
Watson
Hibberd
Average age equals = 24.5
If i include Richmonds:
Bachelor (soon to be delisted)
Houli
Short
Hunt (soon to be delisted)
Markov
Ellis
Morris (soon to be delisted)
Garthwaite
Average age = 24.8
So not only do we have a younger backline but it will only decrease in age when we get rid of either hansen or thompson. The good thing about our list management is we have Nielson, Durdin, potentially McKay, and Watson developing to take over our key position players.
Richmond have Rance, Astbury and a bunch of third talls in grimes, mcintosh, garthwaite, and broad who could step up if needed. They are lucky that Astbury and Rance have stayed injury free this year. They currently have no developing KPD's.
But our backline is aging and our defenders are s**t...
View attachment 405409
Take a look at the ladder.
Just pointing out the ladder suggests your backline is s**t.
It actually suggests our midfield and forwards often don't apply enough pressure around the ground which leaves our backs out to dry… but your comeback argument was superb man. Well thought out.Just pointing out the ladder suggests your backline is s**t.
Just like this thread, but with the opposite point of view.
Just pointing out the ladder suggests your backline is s**t.
If you want to conduct superficial analysis, it could be put to you that the last 30 years says your whole club is s**t.Just pointing out the ladder suggests your backline is s**t.