Play Nice Dusty Incident #chopstickgate [$5k suspended fine - Club Statement Page 229 of Thread]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 16, 2007
Posts
1,793
Likes
3,003
Location
Berwick Hot Springs
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
NY GIANTS, Yankees, Spurs
The answer to all this is so f$#@&n obvious...









Dusty needs a girlfriend.
Hook him up boys...a good woman will have him behaving!
He can come stay with us. My wife will take care of him. My 3 year old has nicknamed all his stuffed tiger toys dusty anyway so whats the bloody difference.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

kozi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Posts
36,000
Likes
37,418
Location
Siberia
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Dubs, United
Never heard of so much BS in my life.Thought family was the safest place to be if your in fear.
But anyway we know your agenda.
He's been BS'ing on his high horse from the moment news of this incident broke. Fact is we don't condone anything about what Martin did, but we're still after the truth concerning the allegations. Rfctiger isn't after any truth at all, his only agenda is to defend the account given at any cost. Don't worry that logic points to holes in the story, there's always something that can be reached for to explain them. According to him RFC is a judicial authority now and just by talking to her they've passed a "verdict" that every single detail is accurate, so now noting can even be questioned. Absolute hogwash.

And if anyone thinks because I don't believe some details are accurate that I'm saying Dusty is completely innocent of anything and should not be punished they are completely wrong.
 
Last edited:

rfctiger74

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Posts
43,913
Likes
81,628
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
He's been BS'ing on his high horse from the moment news of this incident broke. Fact is we're just after the truth. He's not after any truth at all, his only agenda is to defend the woman's story at any cost for reasons unknown to anyone. Don't worry that logic points to holes in her story, there's always something that can be reached for to explain them. According to him RFC is a judicial authority now and just by talking to her they've passed a "verdict" that every single detail she's said is accurate, so now the details of the incident cannot even be questioned. Absolute hogwash.

Now watch him go back to me calling her a "bitch" for the 50th time because that somehow makes his position look more solid.
Still hating on the victim I see
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Posts
1,512
Likes
5,492
Location
Eastern 'Burbs
AFL Club
Richmond
He's been BS'ing on his high horse from the moment news of this incident broke. Fact is we're just after the truth. He's not after any truth at all, his only agenda is to defend the woman's story at any cost for reasons unknown to anyone. Don't worry that logic points to holes in her story, there's always something that can be reached for to explain them. According to him RFC is a judicial authority now and just by talking to her they've passed a "verdict" that everything single detail she's said is accurate so the actual facts cannot even be questioned. Absolute hogwash.

Now watch him go back to me calling her a "bitch" for the 50th time because that somehow makes his position more solid.
Seriously? I have read the EXACT same posts as you have and there is none of that insidious incinuation that you have made here. He has an opinion - which is valid - and others (such as myself) happen to largely agree with.

The fact is that 'truth' as you put is never static, nornis it black and white. That is essentially what rfctiger74 has said this whole time - or at least how I have said it.

He is defending the woman's story - as I have mind you - because it is first and foremost his right to do so, but because he believes - as do I - that she shouldn't be lambasted because she asked an RFC player to quiet down, then complained to the media when she felt the club hadn't taken the matter seriously. For that I personally can only commend her and agree wholly with the reasons put for her actions.

Lastly this verdict nonsense you sprout all stems from the fact that the club have publically said they have taken her version of events.

The only 'hogwash' as far as Im concerned was attacking a fellow poster on grounds that are untrue and have no merit.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Sir_Loin

Premium Platinum
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Posts
17,577
Likes
39,722
AFL Club
Richmond
Seriously? I have read the EXACT same posts as you have and there is none of that insidious incinuation that you have made here. He has an opinion - which is valid - and others (such as myself) happen to largely agree with.

The fact is that 'truth' as you put is never static, nornis it black and white. That is essentially what rfctiger74 has said this whole time - or at least how I have said it.

He is defending the woman's story - as I have mind you - because it is first and foremost his right to do so, but because he believes - as do I - that she shouldn't be lambasted because she asked an RFC player to quiet down, then complained to the media when she felt the club hadn't taken the matter seriously. For that I personally can only commend her and agree wholly with the reasons put for her actions.

Lastly this verdict nonsense you sprout all stems from the fact that the club have publically said they have taken her version of events.

The only 'hogwash' as far as Im concerned was attacking a fellow poster on grounds that are untrue and have no merit.
Hang, on what more did she want from the club other than apology? Did she want them to say more in the media did she? A personal apology from Martin wasn't enough?

I do not believe for one single minute that the clubs statement had anything to do with her going to the media. That is absolute bullshit and there's absolutely more to this story than something as pathetic as that
 

kozi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Posts
36,000
Likes
37,418
Location
Siberia
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Dubs, United
Seriously? I have read the EXACT same posts as you have and there is none of that insidious incinuation that you have made here. He has an opinion - which is valid - and others (such as myself) happen to largely agree with.

The fact is that 'truth' as you put is never static, nornis it black and white. That is essentially what rfctiger74 has said this whole time - or at least how I have said it.

He is defending the woman's story - as I have mind you - because it is first and foremost his right to do so, but because he believes - as do I - that she shouldn't be lambasted because she asked an RFC player to quiet down, then complained to the media when she felt the club hadn't taken the matter seriously. For that I personally can only commend her and agree wholly with the reasons put for her actions.

Lastly this verdict nonsense you sprout all stems from the fact that the club have publically said they have taken her version of events.

The only 'hogwash' as far as Im concerned was attacking a fellow poster on grounds that are untrue and have no merit.
Sorry but I don't think you've read everything from him, including what's on other boards.

He's passed off anyone questioning the details as believing there's a "conspiracy".

He's labeled RFC a judicial authority that has already passed a verdict (in 24 hours mind you), so now the case is shut and anyone who questions anything should be labeled as "hating the victim".

You're correct that the truth is never static nor black and white. So I don't see why there's this push to try and prove that the truth is now set in stone and anyone who questions anything is bonkers.
 

STK2020

Premiership Player
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Posts
4,159
Likes
7,361
AFL Club
St Kilda
I doubt very much Dusty will get 12 months .
He will be punished but to what extent I couldn't guess .
Maybe a ban from watching Pines Footy Club matches but that would effect beer sales so NO .
 

kiwi babe 9

Team Captain
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Posts
431
Likes
703
AFL Club
Richmond
If Dusty gets a 12 month ban for this then if any player in the future is found committing actual assault then they will need to be baned by the AFL for life.
Im surprised if the afl dont charge him with bringing the game into disripute or whateva they call it. Doesnt warrant a yr at all. Maybe 2 to 4 games at best
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom