Bear31
Club Legend
- Feb 15, 2020
- 1,145
- 1,751
- AFL Club
- Sydney
dont agreeAliir could be finished by the time his contract runs out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dont agreeAliir could be finished by the time his contract runs out
Yikes
Not criticism, more reality...he has given everything he has to give... there is no more improvement here...here, there is no more improvement ( you have to say it like the chopper movie bit...)
We lack a lot of talls. Alliir is best as a third tall. intercepting. he is played as first or second tall and today as ruck. i like him as third tall/intercepting take the game on type. Lack of talls in the ruck and up front have pushed him outside his comfort zone. good for his development. im not as negative as others on this forum. we are down. yes. but we are young and developing. im optimistic for our future. a couple of academy players with skill and pace coming in next year. im happy as a swans fandont agree
Good game, despite the margin it felt like the two late goals in the first we kicked decided the game. This year isn't worth much anyway, get a good first rounder this draft, you guys will be hard to beat with Franklin and Daniher as your two main targets next year.
Please try someone else, Hayward is lost at the moment. He needs some Intro club or whatever is being played at the lower level to rebuild the confidence he lost when he got his jaw smashed against Carlton. Hayward was one of the brightest young players going around, but right now is taking a spot he does not deserve.
Given the year that this is, selections to improve the side are not the main focus. With no seconds footy of any real note, we need to alternate some selections to actually see what we have got. No use alternating with average players who we basically have a fix on...Ronke, Gray,Cunningham.....we need to assess the Footes, Amarty's Warners, etc and our only option this year really is to do it at the level. I am not sure about the argument they need to earn it, I don't really see how they earn it this year other than behind the scenes where we cant see. My view though is they need to get some exposure for the benefit of our future.
I did not mind Melican and Clarke coming in because they were experienced players who had not had their chance this season. I feel they will want to have a look at the older squad players first. Then the younger players more likely to get selected later in the season.
Though I don't think there will be mass changes after ever loss. Or large amounts of young players being debuted. It is still round 6 against the Premiers.
Good game, despite the margin it felt like the two late goals in the first we kicked decided the game. This year isn't worth much anyway, get a good first rounder this draft, you guys will be hard to beat with Franklin and Daniher as your two main targets next year.
Maybe because he isn't ready?They were okay, just have to question what the point is? Why not play Gould? We need to use this year for what it is.
Maybe because he isn't ready?
This is a guy who was told to get into shape at the end of last year because he wasn't up to standard to be worth drafting. That he took that on the chin and made improvements is great, but it is possible that the club feel that he isn't yet at a point where he can run out a full game at AFL level.
While I understand the desire to be able to see the new players in action, they need to be justifying their selection. You may think there are players in the current 22 who ought to be dropped due to poor performance, but you only do that when there are good performances from their potential replacements that justify the swap. Hard for any of us on here to make any judgements on that without being able to watch them play or train.
Part of what has to be done this year is work out which of the players who are coming off contract get another year on the list. We have a very long list of players who don't yet have a contract for 2021, a list which includes Melican, Grey and Clarke who were three of our four "ins" this week. Just as important as getting games in to our good young players is sorting out which of the players who have been on the list for a few seasons now or who have been brought in as mature aged players are worth persisting with.Doesn't have to be him, but any one of Gould, Stephens (who played senior SANFL last year in the guts), or Warner would be fine. It just seems these selections are "lets try to not lose by too much" rather than building for 2021 and beyond. We aint making the finals, lets build. Now I'm not saying play all of them but 1-2 of them is a nice mix, and they can swap in and out.
Part of what has to be done this year is work out which of the players who are coming off contract get another year on the list. We have a very long list of players who don't yet have a contract for 2021, a list which includes Melican, Grey and Clarke who were three of our four "ins" this week. Just as important as getting games in to our good young players is sorting out which of the players who have been on the list for a few seasons now or who have been brought in as mature aged players are worth persisting with.
I would be very surprised if we didn't see some games from all three of Gould, Stephens and Warner this season, but selecting them before they have earned the call up isn't necessarily fast tracking their development.
A lot of talk about Stephens, Gould and Warner who come to our club as relative unknowns without much chance to prove themselves.
But what about Foot and Wicks? Both really impressed in the NEAFL last year, both could play a role in our side. Foot as that Ronke/Gray/Taylor role, and Wicks as that small forward who can rotate through the mids (a la Papley.)
Feel like these types of selections would serve both purposes of injecting some youth and energy into the side as debutants, as well as being less unknown than the three recent draftees and kids who we need to know can play or not.
The game went how I thought it would go,
My favourite part was the commentary talking about the Grand Final moving to WA.
"Gee knowing your going to be hosting the grand final must be a big advantage." "Yeah". "Yep".
Idiots.
Wouldn't mind either one play next week actually. Not the worst shout actually.
Sometimes they say the quiet part out loud without realising it.The game went how I thought it would go,
My favourite part was the commentary talking about the Grand Final moving to WA.
"Gee knowing your going to be hosting the grand final must be a big advantage." "Yeah". "Yep".
Idiots.
Theres a lot of requests / demands that we play debutants.. The Swans have debuted maybe more players than any other club the last couple of seasons. Horse has said in the past that 'they need to be ready,, that to throw them in when not ready can damage their development'.
With the injuries at the moment to All our talls, which as Joycerema just said 'is our backbone, and has destroyed our structure',, to debut players now could be like feeding them to the lions.
Haywood, Blakey, McCartin (pre-injury) are struggling because the oppos best defenders are taking them.. No Buddy or Reid filters further down. Same goes for Allirr, COR and the entire defence. The no ruck puts extra pressure on McInerney, Florent and Rowbum - who are doing ok, but would be much better off if the ruck contest was even. Basically all the inexperienced players are suffering at the loss of our experienced Talls.
Don't forget that McLean and McInerney (who have played less than 10 games) are getting a lot of game time / development
In saying all this.. I can see a Foot, Ling, Wicks, Stoddart, Amartey or Maibaum get a game real soon.. and if we have Buddy/Reid and McCartin, Sinkers, Brand all playing later in the season, then there's opportunities for Gould, Stephens, Warner etc
ps.. No team in the comp would have won their last game with the equivalent injuries that we have
Spot on , there no good when fit (Take buddy away from this ) but vital when injuredOur injuries are no worse than most clubs
One is a 33 year old forward , most clubs dont bother with them but yeah he is a key player if hes ever healthy again
Reid would be delisted at most clubs
McCartin was playing like rubbish
Brand is what a 3 game hawks reject, not established 22
Sinclair everyone wanted dropped anyway
Naismith looked ok but is where you could be good money he would be , has he got to 30'games yet
Knoll wouldn't get a game at EB games
the fact you are right and we cant win with those outs is the issue, the team isnt very good,but its not true other teams dont cope with similar or even worse
the expectations of this current team should be bottom 4 side, we cant do more repair work until the off season, I reckon the sooner people expect patches of good footy at best, the odd surprise win when the team is expected to lose,the easier it is
I agree dont rush every kid in, but at the same time i think its pointless patching the team up with guys who show little when they play, i wont name names, but there 5 at least yesterday why bother
I get that view, I just can't agree sorry, I'd rather get games into players that will be here and will contribute long term. Lets be real is a Clarke type really one we need long term? Grey should be playing as an inside mid (I wouldn't be against him as an inside mid)
Good to see a positive slant on things in BF for a change.Our injuries are no worse than most clubs
One is a 33 year old forward , most clubs dont bother with them but yeah he is a key player if hes ever healthy again
Reid would be delisted at most clubs
McCartin was playing like rubbish
Brand is what a 3 game hawks reject, not established 22
Sinclair everyone wanted dropped anyway
Naismith looked ok but is where you could be good money he would be , has he got to 30'games yet
Knoll wouldn't get a game at EB games
the fact you are right and we cant win with those outs is the issue, the team isnt very good,but its not true other teams dont cope with similar or even worse
the expectations of this current team should be bottom 4 side, we cant do more repair work until the off season, I reckon the sooner people expect patches of good footy at best, the odd surprise win when the team is expected to lose,the easier it is
I agree dont rush every kid in, but at the same time i think its pointless patching the team up with guys who show little when they play, i wont name names, but there 5 at least yesterday why bother