The whole point of fielding is to do the opposite to what you just said.
I understand that point but if you don't have the skills & reflexes to do that then you certainly won't have the skills & reflexes to protect yourself either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The whole point of fielding is to do the opposite to what you just said.
I really don’t think on the grand scale of things, that a batsman cutting a ball so hard that backward point gets hit on the head and killed is at the pointy end of the risk ladder in Australian amateur sport.
Some of the best fieldsmen I've seen have played in low grade suburban cricket
Because apparently Ed Cowan playing D-Grade local cricket is extremely dangerous.Gents , I've obviously missed the start of this discussion. Why are you talking about this stuff
Because apparently Ed Cowan playing D-Grade local cricket is extremely dangerous.
Because he wants to play with mates apparently.Why would he be playing d grade local cricket
Really ??
Go ask JLT or any of the other sports insurers if they would payout on a player getting injured as a result of playing against someone who is 5-6 levels higher in ability.
Whilst you can all laugh and think this is funny and not an issue, you obviously have had little to do with cricket administration.
We had a South African guy play B-Grade for us, I asked him if he bowled at all seeing as we knew he could bat, he said he wasn't good enough to be a net bowler when he played for one of the provinces U/19 team. He clean bowled two guys in his first over, he was very good so you have to wonder how good the regular bowlers were if he couldn't get a trundle in the nets.
One of Cowan's first-class teammates played in D-Grade, he rolled the arm over, he hit the opening batsmen in the arm twice and nearly sent him to hospital for x-rays even though he is recognised purely as a batsmen in the State team.
The point is, even first class players doing their non-preferred skill can be a handful for players of seriously lesser skills.
This post needs more recognition.He'd have got a game if he stayed in Tassie.
I accept that there's a boys club in Australian cricket, there always has been, ask Gary Cosier. Brett Geeves makes some good points but I feel there's a strong hint of resentment in his articles that he was never part of it.
As I’ve said before, surely it was Maddison over Cowan? Hughes is a decent player and batted well.I think Hughes over Cowan was an awful call (Klinger, to compare dumped veteran to dumped veteran, was at least fairly ordinary in the Shield last year.)
But that's an awful column.
Renshaw should be thanking his lucky stars that Cowan's not playing and scoring Shield runs at the moment! Think there'd be a case for change for the Ashes series given that Renshaw - whilst young and with potential - is in a pretty good rut at the minute.
I dare say the main issue was that he was averaging 31 at test level and couldn't buy a run.Cowan publicly supporting Mickey Arthur over 'homeworkgate' was probably very damaging from his prospects, especially as Arthur was removed soon afterwards and as a lot of Australian players were very unhappy over that saga, alienated him from his teammates.
True, but he seemed to be a favourite under the Arthur regime and around 2013 and the way Australia were going as a batting lineup in that 2013 period, Clarke was pretty much the only certainty.I dare say the main issue was that he was averaging 31 at test level and couldn't buy a run.