Closes after next weekend - make Chief laugh (the most) and win a prize!
You can now upload videos to your posts. Just click "Attach files" and upload!
The next goes out to get the 204 points.Let’s say Henry goes 10 & we’ve got Melbs 2nd (currently 20) for Langdon. After NGA discounts we only have to make up 204 points. Henry won’t go until 12-16 though imo. Probably later 1st round if he misses the combine.
Yes.So would still have pick 6-7 and 36, before the Hill scenario?
Yeah I agree. Plus Henry’s combine testing will likely be compromised because of his injury. So he will likely slide to late 1st. Plus there’s always bolters late.I'd be shocked if Henry gets bid on before #15. Wouldn't be surprised, actually expecting a bit in the 20's. Academy players slide quite often, clubs don't really see the point in bidding.
Confirmed. Freo have no 3rd or 4th rounder. Still..... A lot can happen in trade weekMFC 2nd round for Langdon is about right with something later coming back the other way. I believe Freo don't currently hold 2019 3rd or 4th rounders though - Freo fans to confirm? But all that could change or 2020 picks could come into play.
mate catches up with him regularly and he said he's not going anywhere. Make of that what you will. I imagine that in the age of social media you may want to play your cards close to your chest. Having said that, there's been no evidence of him saying anywhere he is considering a move to Vic (like with bHill). It's pretty much been: uncontracted player from Vic who has left contract talks late = definitely going.So is he going anywhere or not?
Pretty controversial there, but would be an interesting strategy. I can also see us covering the loss of one, but two would be really difficult.I tend to agree.
We are probably going to get unders in a trade for Langdon and overs for Hill so i'd prefer we keep Landgon if it comes to one or the other.
Thats an interesting point for discussion. When players get injured through the year, say B Hill and Langdon out at same time the impact is far greater than if they are out at the end of the year (they leave) and there is a whole summer of planning and player development to cover the loss. But only if the talent is there to develop of course.Pretty controversial there, but would be an interesting strategy. I can also see us covering the loss of one, but two would be really difficult.
Brayshaw was good last night, played with a lot of heart.He went at 50% disposal efficiency. Not sure the dockers need another player with those stats
Neale had a terrific year just before he left. Not sure what the point of the comment is. Players who want a trade or contract extension often perform well. By the way, I'm not in favour of broken contracts. Just shooting the breeze.Played one of his best games for the season.