Ed Langdon

[tonygeeks]

True but DD probably one of the most sensible/decent posters on BF so no dramas there.

Deagle

 

[fnerd]

Deagle

Wouldn’t it be dee-ocker?

 

[tonygeeks]

Wouldn’t it be dee-ocker?

Yeah but it didn't sound as good

 

[Square Peg]

Geez I am real keen to here some more Carlton fans musing over the Demons list management in here. Breath of fresh air.

Yeah we've been brought down to gold coast status, opposition supporters arguing over our players on our board. Yippee.

 

[Funkster]

He's pretty consistent. More than half of his games over the past 2 seasons have been 25 plus and over possessions. Finished 4th in the Dockers B & F last year.

I didn't realise he'd polled so well last year.

He's worked out how to get the ball, and runs hard. At the game I was at a few weeks ago vs Carlton), you could see he works hard and is rewarded with possessions. The problem is he uses it pretty poorly. He doesn't seem to have that good awareness to me. It's OK, if the receiving player has space, but if they are hot or moving with pace, he can't get close to them. I guess that's harder for any player, but Langdon seems to get it more wrong than most.

 

[raffrox]

Will be a better player in a better system. Huge work rate and when we have played well he's been pretty good.

His disposal isn't amazing but given that he and BHill are expected to represent are large part of our attacking game plan his errors are much more on display.

He's likely to go to another team and develop and play much better with a clearer role aka like half a dozen guys did in the late 1990's/early 2000's.