Not any more, IMO.
One off year interrupted by injury and suspension doesn't change a lot.
Just turning 27yo? These are prime years for a footballer. It's not like he's turning 30.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not any more, IMO.
One off year interrupted by injury and suspension doesn't change a lot.
Just turning 27yo? These are prime years for a footballer. It's not like he's turning 30.
Carlton should keep him then, right?
Carlton should keep him then, right?
Carlton should keep him then, right?
Absolutely they should. But have you heard of this little thing called free agency?
Just ignore him he's a Port supporter and they're special in the head
could it be Yarran to crows perhaps? Henderson could make it happen
Absolutely, have you heard of this little thing called RESTRICTED free agent?
could it be Yarran to crows perhaps? Henderson could make it happen
Yes. And? Carlton are trying to negotiate with Betts. They want to keep him. Why wouldn't you? The guy is one of the best small forwards in the league. They're not going to mess up their salary cap balance in the process though.
The ball is in Carlton's court.
If you want to keep him, just match the offer.
Free agency for Restricted free agents is a bit of a misnomer, the clubs hold all the cards.
So if, as you say, "Absolutely they should." re keeping Betts, then keep him, there is nothing anybody else can do that could change it.
So what is your argument exactly?
It's up to Carlton if he stays a Blue or not ...
if you want to keep him you'll find a way to do so in your salary cap, getting rid of other player/s, whatever.
Can you not understand this?
I guess it's up to you if you want to buy that Ferrari or not. I mean, you could forget about the mortgage, stuff the missus & feeding the kids, max the credit cards and take a loan I suppose ... it's up to you
No I can not. This is nothing more than an extreme point of view. Carlton want to keep him, are trying to keep and should keep him. They're just not going to screw over their salary cap or playing list to do so.
But let me ask again, as at this point I am completely lost as to what your point was. Is this all just some extravagant gavotte to support your idea that Eddie Betts has had it as a player because he's 26yo?
Super!
That's because you are talking s**t that doesn't make any sense. You are clearly out of your depth talking about FA and a player you clearly haven't seen much of, so I think it's wise that you have left.Obviously I'm not getting through the tree trunk, you bring up free agency, you bring up salary cap, excellent, we all know about them & understand them ....... except for you it seems.
Bye.
That's because you are talking s**t that doesn't make any sense. You are clearly out of your depth talking about FA and a player you clearly haven't seen much of, so I think it's wise that you have left.
Obviously I'm not getting through the tree trunk ...
Bye.
There's a kind of child-like simpilism to your logic; tends not too penetrate too deeply tbh.
Still haven't a clue what your point was, but sure ... ciao
I tried dumbing it down for you, didn't go far enough, enjoy your circle w**k with the crows
So your smart remark, "But have you heard of this little thing called free agency?", is idiotic, Carlton has the rights to keep him.
What part of the rules about a "Restricted Free Agent" being at the mercy of his current club, do you not understand?